his post on mastodon is here:

https://mastodon.social/@pixelfed/113849098386232034

Dear Mark, I hope this finds you well. I noticed something interesting today - it seems Instagram is blocking links to my little open-source project. You know, the one that lets people share photos without harvesting their personal data or forcing algorithmic feeds on them. I have to admit, I’m flattered. Who would’ve thought a small team of volunteers could build something that would catch your attention? We’re just trying to give people a choice in how they share their memories online. No VCs, no surveillance capitalism, just code and community. Remember when Facebook started? It was about connecting people, not maximizing engagement metrics. Our project might be tiny compared to Instagram, but we’re staying true to that original spirit of social media - giving people control over their online presence without turning them into products. You could’ve ignored us. Instead, by blocking our links, you’ve given us the best endorsement we could ask for. You’ve confirmed what we’ve been saying all along - that big tech is more interested in protecting their walled gardens than fostering genuine innovation. Every time you block a link to our platform, you remind people why we built it in the first place. Your action tells them there are alternatives worth exploring, ones that respect their privacy and agency. So thank you, Mark. You’ve turned our little project into a symbol of resistance against digital monopolies.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Why are you trying to appeal to the better nature of a bad faith actor…

    • LoudWaterHombre@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This letter reads like if Zuck was an ideologically driven tech-anarchist that wanted to connect people that became old and fell for the money but that’s not really true lol

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      To be clearer he stole the whole thing because he was always an entitled sack of poo. He never created a thing, just like Elon.

  • Moineau@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Honestly, though, Zuck doesn’t care. He won’t even read this. Billionaires live in an entirely different universe from the rest of us.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Except he didn’t mention the product name anywhere in the letter. Looks like he purposefully avoided it being interpreted as an ad.

    • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      He thinking about why he isn’t king just like the rest of them. Increasingly we are wondering the same thing. Why is he not like almost almost all past kings. In the past.

    • DBosiers@social.vivaldi.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      @moineau @gi1242 Until it’s over and their costly empires collapse, would not be the first who ends up broke. Fortune is not like rock, although they try to make it like that, they try to cement their throne … whel empires rise and kings fall. The fall usually starts with decadence and arrogance. He already bought his watch…and for the paradise pd fans “higher hair” 🤭

  • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Everyone with their own domain should set up a 307 Temporary Redirect with some short URI and start publishing it for people to use instead.

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The only Meta product I’m kinda forced to have is Whatsapp, as my work and my family use that to communicate, and I have tried to explain Signal to my mom, but to no avail.

    • el_eh_chase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I just got set up on Simple X Chat. From my cursory research it seems to have the best security going in a chat app right now. I find the UI really slick too. It has all the features I use in a chat app anyway. The only thing to be aware of is that all the messages are saved locally, so backup/recovery needs to be handled by you. There’s a couple videos an YouTube that go over the app.

      All that being said, I still have WhatsApp on my phone. There’s still the same problem of getting everyone in your life to download another app.

      • madjo@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        Sure, I’ll be out of the loop regarding work related news and I’ll just text all my coworkers individually. That’s just not feasible!

        I’ve tried several times over the course of a few years (every time Meta or Facebook or Whatsapp was negatively in the news) to move people away from that platform.

        I’ve resigned to the fact that people are stubborn and don’t want to move. I have a Signal account in case someone does move.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Texting costs extra, specially internationally? Also it has a limited feature set and poor intercompatibility.

  • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    251
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Remember when Facebook started? It was about connecting people

    I remember that it was about abusing the private information of all the “dumb fucks” who created an account.

    The letter is good though, but zucky will still be a billionaire whether he will read it or not.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yeah also facebook started as an evolution of men rating women on his campus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Facebook#Facemash It should be no surprise that zuck has recently started proclaiming that he wants a more masculine corporate identity, it’s been that way from the beginning

      “The Kirkland Facebook (referring to the Kirkland House intranet) is open on my computer desktop, and some of these people have pretty horrendous Facebook pictures. I almost want to put some of these faces next to pictures of farm animals and have people vote on which is more attractive.” - Zuck, 2003

    • zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That’s just it. Zuck could sell off and close shop and live large for the rest of his life. And yet he chooses to fuck around with people instead.

      It’s weird.

      There’s creating. And then there’s harvesting content and creations of others. The former is the only one that makes you interesting.

      • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        16 minutes ago

        When you think about it, too, you realize these people have nothing good inside them. They seek power because externally people covet power. Normal people covet power because they want control of their own lives but mark has control and doesn’t fucking get it. He thinks power is inherently good so he steals it all away for himself but no matter how hard he trys he can’t look inward and find anything that means something more than that. It’s truly sad and grotesque. My mind could be set on 100 different paths that would fill me with so much satisfaction that nothing else would matter and mark can’t find one for himself.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      77
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Wasn’t it about ranking female students by attractiveness or something?

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It was first provided to college/edu addresses. It wasn’t what it is today at all.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I deleted my account when that came out, so I’ve been Facebook free since something like 2006.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Maybe it was 2008 instead of 06? Seemed like it came out very early, I’d only had an account for a year or so I think, shortly after it was opened up outside EDU domains.

    • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Facebook was about, “connecting people” though. It was the first stage in its growth. It was also before monetization and was actively losing money.

      • adarza@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        it was always all about the data, even back in the hot-or-not clone days.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It was about growing the user base so more data could be harvested, not about the connections being made.

  • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The dream: releasing a scathingly cordial open letter to an oligarch that has a real chance of ruining their day.

  • Tamlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Connecting Threads in a stupid way to the fediverse but blocking a fediverse website at the same time. I don’t need to understand that right?

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Is this actually getting traction outside of the fediverse? If not, I don’t think it achieved Streisand effect.

    • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It started so he could creep on girls on their campus. Nerds had hard time to socialize, so they made a digital social network to help them with the cause. Dunno if it did. But his early interviews are creepy af, lol