Also, the Jewish God and Muslim Allah are on the International Space Station.

  • MadMaurice@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Satellites block God’s ability to watch us”

    The omniscient, omnipotent god is defeated by a piece of space trash? What a rip-off.

  • BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    This is the right amount of crazy that I’m not sure if it’s honest or parody for this country.

    Also: Jesus gets my prayers because he’s in my heart, checkmate atheists.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, you’re mistaken. Lonnie is on the Right, which means his satellites reflect and amplify prayers. Or at least get a pass. He hates LGBTQ people, so he’s “good.” /s

      • SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        No need for /s because that’s exactly how it works.

        “If you hate the right people and say the right things, you are Good People, and Good People can’t do no wrong. If you’re not one of the Good People, you can do no right. Laws and rationalizations are there to punish those that are not Good People.”

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      yes but he doesn’t want to interfere with our precious free will, starvation and rape be damned

      we just have to pull ourselves up by our bootstraps

  • FerbFletcher@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is either (1) satire, (2) trolling, or (3) someone who has no real grasp of Christianity. Or some combination of the above.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      (4) Protestants doing an unholy amalgamation of Catholic spirituality and Rational Scientific Inquiry to reach absurdist conclusions at their intersection.

      • FerbFletcher@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        My take is that this qualifies as having no real grasp of Christianity. But I wouldn’t argue hard against this being a separate option

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      If there’s something the internet has confirmed since its’ inception, is that humanity is both incredibly clever and incredibly stupid, in equal measure, beyond what I ever imagined was possible, beyond what I could conceive.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Exactly. Everyone knows that Jesus navigates based his position relative to the the absolute position of celestial bodies. That and there is no way that a simple, unarmored satelite would make it past his point-defense batteries and compromise his re-entry trajectory.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s clearly a joke. But it’s not that much more ridiculous than what many Christians actually believe. That’s the joke.

  • LifeBandit666@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Satan wins again. At this point the Christians have to admit they chose the losing side.

    I mean this God of theirs is shit, can’t even get around satellites, didn’t think humans might beat their cocks raw despite seeing it constantly in Human 1.0 (Chimps), or that they might eat fish on a Tuesday or whatever. Even Jesus was fucking a whore and he was God incarnate.

    Also God invented Cancer.

    • GNU Dude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Jesus fucking a prostitute. I’m interested. Never read the bible so I don’t know about it, but I’m curious.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Mary Magdalene. It’s never explicitly stated in the canonical Bible (as if that means anything), but they were very close.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          She was just one of His many followers, it’s quite an absurd speculation. Also doesn’t say that she was a prostitute anywhere.

          • prole@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            True. If only the was more than one story from his life between being a child, and being in his 30s… Oh well I guess we’ll just have to assume he lived as a monk and denied himself of anything pleasurable 🙄

            Though I recently learned that there is a book about it, it’s just that it wasn’t chosen to be “canonical,” and therefore means you can ignore it completely? Curiously, Jesus does some really fucked up things in that book, including showing off his powers, and killing people just to bring them back to life. The Infancy Gospel of Thomas is the book btw.

            Who gets to decide that book isn’t true but the rest are?

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              The infancy Gospel of Thomas was written well over one hundred years after Jesus had already left earth, in the second century. It claimed that Jesus performed random frivolous miracles for fun, when the Gospel of John said that the water to wine miracle was the first. We also don’t know who “Thomas the Israelite” is either.

              It’s likely just something someone made up to try and give a narrative for Jesus’ childhood.

              Jesus also likely cast the demons out of Mary Magdalene while in His thirties. Jesus wouldn’t need a female partner if He actually was truly God.

              • prole@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                When were Matthew, Mark, Luke and John written?

                Here, let me save you a quick Google:

                The Gospel of Mark probably dates from c. AD 66–70, Matthew and Luke around AD 85–90, and John AD 90–110. Despite the traditional ascriptions, all four are anonymous and most scholars agree that none were written by eyewitnesses.

                Oh look at that.

                after Jesus had already left Earth

                Lol ok bud. Whatever delusion makes you happy.

                • Flax@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  What are you trying to prove? The infancy gospel of thomas was written likely around 180AD and even then, people were already calling it out as being a fake.

                  You clearly aren’t looking for an open-minded discussion by calling me “delusional”, anyway.

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              If it was a biblical fact, you could give me details by giving me biblical references, not a french fiction novel 😂

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          There does seem to be an effort made to get rid of her by the early church followers. Implying that she was a whore could have been a strategy. It’s weird because the Johannine community tried to save her in text. Which would mean it was the Paul crowd that did it and there is not a clear reason why. She would have had little interactions with the Paul community.

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              The Bible. What do you want from me?

              The Christ confessor in Mark, Luke, and Matthew is Peter while Mary gets to go to the cave. In John the Christ confessor is Mary and she gets to go to the cave. The early church fathers liked to really play up her supposed life of being a whore before repentance. Meanwhile Paul hints at her existence and says nice things about her. At the same time Mark makes her so dumb she “tells no one” about what would be the single most important moment in Christianity while Luke and Matthew give her a helper to make the right decision.

              It’s hard to pinpoint exactly what happened but there is a trend. She goes from being a major leader of the earliest church to a whore that Jesus saves and is too stupid to know what she saw. If I had to take a bet: she was part of the very early church, funded and organized a lot, and had some falling out probably with someone from Paul’s community. So Mark tried to memoryhole her and would have done it except John had some story about how she rocked and saved her.

              • Flax@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                What do you mean the Christ Confessor? In Matthew 28 , Peter isn’t mentioned, but Mary finds the empty tomb. In John 20 and Luke 24, Peter runs to the tomb after being told by Mary. In all of these accounts, Peter is given a position which appears to be “lesser” than Mary Magdelene. In Mark, she was too afraid to tell anyone until Jesus appeared to her and reassured her (John goes into detail about this, and notes how she was crying in distress). If she actually didn’t tell anyone permanently, that fact wouldn’t have been recorded.

                Also worth mentioning, she had seven demons driven out. Wasn’t a whore. This is basically just a weirdly elaborate theory which doesn’t really hold any water or value whatsoever.

                • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Christ confessor: the person who answers Jesus when he asks who I am for the first time. Check for yourself the first three gospels it is Peter the fourth it is Mary.

                  The endings of Mark wasn’t part of the original. They were attempts at harmonizing the text. The original ending ends with Mary fleeing the tomb and telling no one.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    11 months ago

    All those prayers from soccer fans for their team to win the World Cup were being intercepted all along 😥

  • 768@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    That sounds like the story of those Christians who were afraid of lightning rods because it might interfere with their God’s ability to punish people by lightning.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or the ones who thought street lighting was demonic. This pattern has basically occurred repeatedly throughout history

      • 768@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I consider these associations of QOL improvements with mythical characteristics attempts of narrative control, with which religious leaders could exert power over new developments. My assumption is that previously, organised religions were powerful and agile enough in their narrative that those new development could be held in control of the religion, but with the beginning of exponential and distributed knowledge production they were kinda outnumbered and became as weird as they are today. I have no motivation or sources to back this up, though.

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Sorry mate, I think you’re just crazy.

          It’s likely just paranoid people using religion to justify their paranoia

  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ok everyone stop upvoting and downvoting. We’ve reached the perfect score.