• Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Except “small government” is the same size it just funnels money to military contractors and debt for wealthy peoples tax cuts

    • binarytobis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 months ago

      Sometimes I think about all of the lies I was told as a kid like “on one side people want to pay less taxes, and on the other people are willing to pay more to help others” when really it’s “cut programs that help people, pay more taxes unless you’re so rich it doesn’t matter, and actively commit as many evils as you can think of, or alternatively don’t do all that.” Like, there’s supposed to be a silver lining no matter which side wins. But no, all bad all the way down and the benefits that motivated the boomers in my life to cause this terror aren’t even happening. Weren’t groceries supposed to get cheaper or something to help the facism go down?

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        We only get grocery price breaks for NEW fascism. What we have here is the same old fascism so sorry no breaks.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      The small government is actually bigger, deficit is only increasing the more time GOP stays in power and was only balanced under DNC POTUS Bill Clinton.

    • jali67@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      A large chunk of American citizens fall for the libertarian and “small gov” pandered lies, every single time.

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Should be “fuck the 99%”.

    The “middle class” doesn’t think they are poor so this message will fall flat on them. In fact they might support it, because then they get to kick down on someone.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Sorry, I may have misunderstood that. What you meant was they ARE part of the 99% but they don’t consider themselves that way, correct?

      • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        If we’re going by the historical use of the term, yes.

        At the beginning of the early modern period, you had two classes: peasants and aristocrats. You were born into your class and that was that. But early industrialization lead to a funny thing; people who were born peasants, yet through owning things like mines or factories, had amassed enough wealth to rival (and sometimes surpass) the aristocracy. Aristocrats derisively refereed to these wealthy peasants as “The Middle Class”.

        If you were to show an aristocrat our present world, they’d tell you we’re ruled by their middle class.

        • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          At the beginning of the early modern period, you had two classes: peasants and aristocrats.

          IDK, I think that’s a bit of an oversimplification. Not everyone was either an aristocrat or a peasant, there were also tradespeople, craftsmen, innkeepers, merchants, traders, bankers, and of course the clergy (who would often wield enormous power themselves, even over the aristocrats, because they generally had to give their blessing to whatever the rulers decided to do).

          None of these really fit neatly into the peasant/aristocrat dichotomy (except perhaps for the clergy), but I suppose one could lump the rest of them all in together and call them middle class (or townsfolk). Not all of them were rich, of course (in fact, many were probably not), but some of them did quite well for themselves.

  • MuskyMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    I recall a Reagan era quote about a government small enough to drown in a bathtub but a military big enough to put lasers in space.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      “Things are too big! They should be smaller!” is this weird rhetorical phrasing that mostly just ends in Eugenics apologia.

      “Fewer this! Smaller that!” is just a dog whistle for shrinking the number of people.

      • TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Except generally speaking… those far right small government types are actually very concerned with increasing the number of people of their own race… hence why abortion, birth control etc… are what they fight against.

        They just dont’ care about feeding or keeping those people comfortable, they want them toiling away for scraps.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          those far right small government types are actually very concerned with increasing the number of people of their own race

          Sure. Via Leuberstraum. Exterminating the native neighboring populations to make space for settlers.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    What’s needed is to simplify the government to the point that people can actually understand what it does.

    It’s overcomplicated, the laws are written in arcane gibberish that nobody really sees through (if you haven’t studied the laws for 20 years at least), there’s bureaucracy hell, things need to be simpler. that does not mean less government, i.e. handouts should still be paid, but it should happen in a predictable, simple way.

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Remember who pays the taxes and who else controls the government. It would be better for the middle class if they would pool part of their income on their own and be able to decide what is financed with it.

  • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    You are just exchanging a belly fat government for a ass fat government. They jist store the fat in different places.