Two competing toxic 1950’s mentalities.

They will not just eat it they will go ballistic and fight each other over it within .5 seconds of realizing they can get it. They are vicious little animals.

Don’t kink shame.

It’s all typos all the way down. I was actually trying to type a totally different comment.

for absolutely no reason

🤔

Easy choice for me.

I’ll note that kissing is not culturally universal. Remember that colonialism has made a lot of European ideas and norms seem way more universal than they are.

Why wouldn’t I want to imagine it though?

I didn’t really interpret it that way. I took it as “look how annoying people who complain about social justice are”.

I don’t think she literally supports slavery but it was clearly an allegory for what she views as annoying activist types.

Authoritarian leftist is an oxymoron.

My favorite part of Harry Potter is when Hermione tries to get everyone to oppose slavery and everyone’s just like why are you being so mouthy?

JK Rowling has views that were regressive for the 1800s. It’s amazing we didn’t see it sooner.

US patriotism is fucking creepy as hell.

I guess people are missing my point. People aren’t getting those useless degrees for no reason. They’re getting them to avoid being discriminated against, and even though, yes they are useless in a practical sense, avoiding that discrimination is pretty valuable.

Oh, I’m sorry, you misunderstood. Did you think your degree would earn you something? No, what you’ve gained is the privilege of not being treated like actual garbage and being able to work for some scraps. Count your blessings.

This is literally me 🤣

Well first was this guy’s ideology really distinct or is he just a fascist who talks about environmental issues as a post-hoc justification to make his objectively deranged actions seem more reasonable? And if he’s just a fascist I don’t think he need to take his justifications seriously by giving him a newly named ideology.

But I didn’t mean there are no singular eco-fascists anywhere on earth. There are 8 billion people on the planet so I could make up a mad lib ideology and chances are it’s similar to what someone somewhere believes. But I’ve never met one to my knowledge, not even online. There’s no organized push for this or political power behind it. The vast majority of fascists don’t give a shit about the environment and the vast majority of environmentalists oppose fascism. So the only time I see it mentioned is when people get criticized for discussing the impacts of human population.

I understand why it’s a touchy subject. Past racist policies used overpopulation as a justification for crimes against humanity. But that the human impact on the earth is proportional to our population is just a fact, and it doesn’t make you a fascist to acknowledge that. You’re only a fascist if you think that fact gives you a right to brutalize people, and, as I’ve said, I just don’t hear this from any organized or popular thinkers.

My instance is defederated from lemmygrad so I can’t speak to that one. But from what I hear it’s fairly similar.

I don’t frequent there because I was banned and censored several times and concluded it was a waste of time. The best possible thing to do with Lemmy.ml is ignore it and push for defederation until they stop behaving like petty tyrants.

Same with oaks. Down with the splitters! Lumpers are the chosen people who will inherit the earth botany.

Ecofascism isn’t a real ideology I don’t know why people keep insisting it is. Almost seems like a deliberate psy-op to create divisions among environmentalists. But more likely people are just stupid and afraid and angry.