• anlumo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      They didn’t need the army of lawyers to get license deals, so that’s not a fair comparison.

      • FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Its almost like its unecessary shit made up in order to keep profits away from working people artificially

        • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah its almost like if we didn’t keep extending copyright protections a bunch of stuff would be in the public domain and any streaming service could offer it without having to deal with licensing.

          • Brickhead92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I mean that’s all well and good, but then how would the very deserving shareholders get dividends?

            Won’t somebody think of the shareholders!?

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Nobody gives a shit, you’re not doing enough to punish trump for his obvious, literally filmed and recorded crimes.

    This is the equivalent of the cops celebrating after beating peaceful college protesters while pissing their pants and freezing while the uvalde kids were slaughtered and psychologically tortured.

    You’re focusing on the non victory and ignoring the failures. Cowards.

  • kakes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Love how they make this sound like some incredible feat. When you aren’t bound to license agreements, turns out it’s actually very easy to have a “massive” content library. Literally the only hurdle is storage space.