Per the title. If an animal dies out in nature without any human involvement, shouldn’t it be considered vegan to harvest any of the useful parts from it (not nessicarily meat, think hide), since there was no human-caused suffering involved?

Similarly, is driving a car not vegan because of the roadkill issue?

Especially curious to hear a perspective from any practicing moral vegans.

Also: I am not vegan. That’s why I’m asking. I’m not planning on eating roadkill thank you. Just suggesting the existence of animal-based vegan leather.

  • Mister Neon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s not the question you asked

    shouldn’t it be considered vegan The answer is no, because the definition of the word. I’m sick of “vibe” people. Words have meanings.

    • Baggins [he/him]@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Buddy thinks the dictionary contains all the information he ever needs to know 😂

      People don’t just wake up one day and decide they’re going to abstain from animal products for no reason.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s not the question you asked

      But that’s implied. People aren’t usually vegetarian or vegan because they “hate animals,” but rather because of ethical concerns. And even so, if they’re asking such a question, it’s because they’re basing their understanding on the ethics and not the literal definition. Otherwise, the answer is obvious.