TadoTheRustacean@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agothisIsGoingToBeASeriousDebateprogramming.devimagemessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down13
arrow-up145arrow-down1imagethisIsGoingToBeASeriousDebateprogramming.devTadoTheRustacean@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squarepranaless@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agouse std::process::Command; fn main() { Command::new("sh") .arg("-c") .arg("echo Hello World!") .spawn() .unwrap(); } Like this?
minus-square30p87@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoNo, more like use std::process::Command; fn main() { Command::new("sh").arg("-c").arg("echo Hello World!").spawn().unwrap(); } . Just a little bit shorter, as it seems /s
minus-squareTadoTheRustacean@programming.devOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoIsn’t echo a shell builtin?
minus-squarepranaless@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes and no. While coreutils does provide an echo binary, shells also have a built-in for optimisation purposes. At first I had the code calling the binary directly, but then changed it to spawning a shell (and so using the builtin). It’s very cursed either way.
Personally,
echo Hello World!use std::process::Command; fn main() { Command::new("sh") .arg("-c") .arg("echo Hello World!") .spawn() .unwrap(); }Like this?
No, more like
use std::process::Command; fn main() { Command::new("sh").arg("-c").arg("echo Hello World!").spawn().unwrap(); }.
Just a little bit shorter, as it seems /s
Isn’t echo a shell builtin?
Yes and no. While coreutils does provide an
echobinary, shells also have a built-in for optimisation purposes.At first I had the code calling the binary directly, but then changed it to spawning a shell (and so using the builtin). It’s very cursed either way.