It’s more difficult to run government psyops on mastodon.

Seems like it might be for millions of people who didn’t show up to the polls. Sure feels like the outcome.

Recognize that it is a farcical, illegitimate charade. You know, the only logical conclusion when you’re told you’re not allowed to choose no genocide.

You believe the only options are versions of genocide, because you are in a MAGA death cult.

There’s absolutely no logical reason to believe that. Democrats have escalated war on three fronts with nuclear armed superpowers, and armed a genocide.

What group of people could Democrats kill that would leave you unable to support either party? Clearly, it’s not Arabs.

Turns out there are stupid questions.

Is genocide not too far to compromise on? Or is it less of an issue because it’s a genocide of Arabs?

I’m pretty sure Stein and De La Cruz have never been accused of rape.

I’m not a genocide supporter. Prior to this past year, I thought we were all on the same page about that being important.

You have to qualify it with “convictions,” because Harris illegally withheld evidence from defendants in multiple instances, and has openly declared her intent to continue arming the genocide (which is a felony).

I’m not sure ‘I’m voting for the person who got away with it’ is a strong endorsement.

The still living Palestinian children constantly go online to thank people for their vocal support, and the PFLP has asked Americans to boycott the Dems and GOP.

I vote based on their records. Not their promises. Their actual policies are remarkably similar.

A blank check is a blank check. Doesn’t matter if it comes from someone who claims they do it reluctantly, or someone who does it enthusiastically.

Then you’re showing your privilege, and clearly haven’t seen the thousands of images and videos of shredded children coming out of Palestine for the past year.

I want our politicians to follow the law, and stop arming the genocide.

This is a very low bar. It’s pathetic they can’t reach it.

Do y’all ever stop to ask, ‘what could we do to win these people to our side?’ Or do you think the condescension will actually work this time?

Pointing out bad actors isn’t intended to win an argument.

I’m loving the lack of self-awareness. Trying to play both sides as if y’all love democracy, but losing your minds when anyone suggests any government that isn’t an oligarchy.

Either an astroturfer or bootlicker.

https://www.salon.com/2016/11/09/the-hillary-clinton-campaign-intentionally-created-donald-trump-with-its-pied-piper-strategy/

It’s really pathetic bootlicking of the ‘party elites,’ and obscenely undemocratic, to insist that there needs to be someone “in charge” to overrule the democratic choices of the party base.