• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2024

help-circle



  • People who are using their cellphone/mobile as a telefon (calling someone) but not holding it as a telephone but as a slab in front of their face. And ofc with the speaker on.

    Slightly better but still stupid: Videocalling (or Facetiming) with the phone right in front of their nose.

    I mean, just hold the phone so that the speaker is at your ear and the mic is right by your mouth…






  • freeman@feddit.orgtoMemes@lemmy.mlI can't be the first to post this lmao
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Nato is a group of independant, mostly democratic states. Nato generally doesn’t kill people, because it doesn’t attack, does not do genocide and most relevant for the meme, it doesn’t redraw state lines.

    If Nato would do several of those things, you might have a point, please prove me wrong.

    Also the second pic is ridiculous. What even do the Nato-emblems mean? It cant be singular bases or single memberstates. So what is it? And what about russias allies, why arent they painted/highlited? If one would want to show the big allies, the BRICS+ states could be marked. But like this, the second image is worthless.





  • Thanks, sounds interesting altho on first impression it doesn’t seem too viable to mee. It reminds me if the “jury” some countries have, where a group of people decide, what to do with a alleged problematic person. Am not too sure thats the best way to do it.

    And also the “I am not angry, just disappointed” vibe and love-starving seems a bit odd.

    It seems hard to imagine in todays world. But maybe on a local level? In Switzerland we have communal-discussions and votes as local legislation, the other two state powers on communal level are elected. Thats enough politics for most people.


  • freeman@feddit.orgtoLefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comCompassionate Discourse
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    But what about bad actors? Surely anarchists believe, that there are “bad people” who want personal gain/wealth/possessions by stealing or through fraud for example?

    So then there needs to be a (central) authority who can make enforce rules, even if they are trivially “natural” or democratically validated.

    And for that authority to do their job, they need authority over other people. The ability to lock a appartment up to investigate a murder for example. Or maybe even search a house of a alleged criminal.

    Or is all of that just the capitalistic way of dealing with things and there is an other way? Or do anarchists believe that problems of that kind wont exist in their utopia?

    If there is a bad tone, Im sorry, not a native speaker and I am not trying to argue in bad faith.

    Edit: Thats kind of the thing about the intersection of anarchism and feminism I find curious. (In my city I see stickers like “feminists for anarchism” or “anarchy: …, …, and feministic”)

    And at the same time feminists want a stronger percicution (sorry) and punishment for sexualized crime, better institutional protection in labour-law and so on. In my view all things that are only achiveable with “more government”, or at least better government/laws and certainly not with less government/rules/authorities.