On Windows, KDE Plasma, and likely many other Desktops, if a window is fullscreen maximized and you push the mouse to the top edge and click, it will close.

Chrome-ium actually fixed that in their builtin buttons to work the same.

Not on GNOME because there is a panel at the top, lol.

But also not when using GTK apps on these desktops, where it should work. Instead you need a lot of precision, for no reason.

An easy fix would be to expand the actual clickbox further, not only around the (oversized) close button circle, but to the edge of the screen window.

This would make Thunderbird, Firefox, etc. closable likel any other normal app. ;D

If you support this, leave a like on the issue. And lets hope this doesnt get closed because of whatever…

Edit

This is about maximized, not fullscreen windows. But also about those.

And the request is to expand the clickbox to the corner of the window, not of the screen.

  • UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 month ago

    I remember watching a youtube video about UI design on computers and the lady narrator said that the corners of the screen have effectively infinite size. I don’t remember anything else but that line stood out.

    • imecth@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s really a design decision. Gnome’s corners don’t have infinite size because you can grab the window by clicking anywhere on the topbar including in fullscreen. It creates exceptions in the design, why should the close button expand to the corner but not the others? If the close button is too small to click on, that’s another issue entirely.

      • Pantherina@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Yes I thought about that exact argument. They oversize their panels on purpose, there is tons of other space to click on, which is also way less risky, that next to the close button.

        And this expansion is about all decoration buttons of course.

  • clubb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    And how would you access the controls above the app? I understand you’re most likely on kde, I used to shre the sentiment, but extending the close button to the panel would only break things

    • ugo@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Reread the OP. They say:

      not on GNOME, because you have a panel at the top

      And

      when usign GTK apps on those [non-GNOME] desktops

      So you would not “access the controls above the app”, because having controls above the app is not covered by this scenario.

      The scenario is:

      1. You don’t have a top panel
      2. You have a maximized GTK app

      Which makes the close button be in the corner of the screen, but without actually extending to it.

      On topic: never knew this was a problem, guess I got spoiled by the Qt environment

      • NekkoDroid@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s been a thing I personally have been wondering why this is how it is for a while. Personally I like most of the GNOME stuff, but this decision has always stood out as odd.

        But then again I almost always use ctrl+w or alt-f4 to close apps, so I am mostly unaffected.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I thought full screen windows were supposed to be above everything else? Including panels?

    • everett@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I think OP said

      if a window is fullscreen

      as opposed to simply being maximized.