ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-216 days agoPermanently Deletedmessage-squaremessage-square22fedilinkarrow-up142arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up141arrow-down1message-squarePermanently DeletedChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-216 days agomessage-square22fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareRogerWilco@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 years agoXFS supports trim too, and is arguably the highest performing filesystem for NVMEs in terms of multi-theaded use-cases. BTRFs is among the slowest filesystems for NVMEs both in IOPS and sequential metrics.
minus-squareAProfessional@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoIndeed. BTRFS is a different class of filesystem in terms of features too. Their merits are more than “SSD support”.
XFS supports trim too, and is arguably the highest performing filesystem for NVMEs in terms of multi-theaded use-cases. BTRFs is among the slowest filesystems for NVMEs both in IOPS and sequential metrics.
Indeed. BTRFS is a different class of filesystem in terms of features too. Their merits are more than “SSD support”.