• Cypher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    He’s just peddling right wing talking points with no intention of actually examining the data.

    Your comment is good for anyone else who stumbles across this and is willing to learn.

    • Forester@yiffit.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Did you even read your own article? It’s an opinion piece by one man. He’s using back of the napkin calculations just like I am, and while his math is mostly correct, and while I love his margins for error for increased solar required to take up the slack for unplanned issues with renewable power generation, he never discusses how much money it would cost to buy up all of that land to implement that massive amount of solar. He conveniently skips over eminent domaining of over 27,000 acres of land required to make such a large solar farm to replace the two already almost completed reactors not even counting to replace the two older already in place reactors… from that same location. Oh then we still have to also pay to decommission them…