Linux - Lemmy
lemmy.ml
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short). Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy. ### Rules * Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise. * No misinformation * No NSFW content * No hate speech, bigotry, etc ### Related Communities * !opensource@lemmy.ml [/c/opensource@lemmy.ml] [https://lemmy.ml/c/opensource] * !libre_culture@lemmy.ml [/c/libre_culture@lemmy.ml] [https://lemmy.ml/c/libre_culture] * !technology@lemmy.ml [/c/technology@lemmy.ml] [https://lemmy.ml/c/technology] * !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml [/c/libre_hardware@lemmy.ml] [https://lemmy.ml/c/libre_hardware] Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder [https://www.iconfinder.com/pocike], licensed under CC BY 3.0 [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/]

Looking for some suggestions, preferably with existing tested compatibility with the Framework laptop hardware so I can do more well rounded research. I’m the most familiar with Ubuntu and CentOS. Picked Ubuntu initially for mid 2000s nostalgia purposes but it’s time to move on.

EDIT: As some people have pointed out, “more privacy oriented” was probably not the best phrase to use here. I am looking to move off of a Linux OS with corporate sponsorship and also looking forward to exploring Linux OSes that are privacy focused.

  • danielfgom@lemmy.world
    231·
    1 year ago

    I use Ubuntu and I don’t have an issue with them. However if you really want to move away from that, and you’re perfectly free and entitled to do so, I would have thought Debian would be the best bet. It’s 100% community based and stable and since you’re used to working with debs and apt, you’ll feel right at home.

    However you’ll have to be content with having an older desktop, because it didn’t change often. Unless you run Debian testing in which case you might well run into issues every now and then.

    I don’t recommend Manjaro as it is highly unreliable.

    You could also look at Arch, vanilla arch, but you’ll have to build and maintain it, and it can break, and you may not want to invest that amount of time.

    As others have said there is Mint, PopOS, Zorin, KDE Neon - which are all based on Ubuntu, so you’re still using Ubuntu, which doesn’t solve your problem.

    There are Debian based distros like Peppermint, MX Linux, Antix (I think) and possibly others. They take all the work out of having to build Debian from scratch but you are limited to the XFCE desktop, which I personally hate.

    In short, there are options but they all have cons as well as pros. Only you can decide what cons your willing to live with.

    • pragmaOnce@sopuli.xyz
      41·
      1 year ago

      Solid answer here. Worth pointing out that MX Linux has other DEs than xfce. I originally left Ubuntu for pop!_os but wanted to use KDE. After realizing that swiching to Kde removed most of what makes pop special, I started looking around again and landed on the ahs/kde version of MX. Its been great! Still a debain distro so its very familiar, but I dpnt have to worry about Canonical making poor decisions upstream.