• QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How? They would have to know C/C++, Qt, QML; then learn how to navigate the codebase, compile the software and debug it.
        All that is very technical

        • YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Far less technical than AV1 support with software rendering, very little technical skills relatively.

          • QuazarOmega@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Uh sure, relatively, but for someone who doesn’t even know how to program that’s relatively a super tall order, I don’t know their background, but the activity itself definitely isn’t low technical requirements in absolute terms, if instead you meant UI concept design, then it would have been more plausible

          • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Its still a high technical skill you ask there. Its just a different field

      • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This sort of attitude is completely new to me and so awesome. Like I can just contribute to software? 🤯

        I have choice words for the UI/UX of most Matrix clients. And they’re open source!

        • atetulo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good. Those things need work.

          But expect a lot of your complaints to fall on deaf ears unless you’re willing to do the work yourself.

          A lot of people in the open source ecosystem really don’t understand good design.

          VLC, however, is one that does.

          • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I really like design! Little buttons and colors and all those bits of tweaking. I’ve been looking more at projects on Lemmy to see how their UIs are coded, but I think the tools and frameworks all sorta run back to HTML/CSS/JavaScript so like if I learned that then I’d understand how to use Qt, PyQt, or Kotlin. Idk. I think designers tend to contract themselves to capital so the idea of an open source UI developer sounds goofy, but fun.

    • prole@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I had to get a plug-in to add click to play/pause so it’s like almost every streaming site. Also, I don’t believe there’s a way to get it to automatically play the next video file in the folder after one video finished, without making a playlist.

      Small gripes, I know. I’m coming from MPC on Windows so I miss some of those features.

      • Darken@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Customization is great however most people barely open any of the menus even tho they contain treasures

        In any case, the current UI is not bad by any means

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I do not care about the UI unless it is incomprehensibly ugly and intolerable, or has missing key buttons I need. VLC does not have that problem, and my UI demands are very low unless its a complex software like file manager or video/audio/photo editing tool.