• Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    If they were tracking what I was buying from the company I wouldn’t give a rats ass, in fact I’m quite sure that information is readily available to them.

    I’m not a privacy nut, I’m usually poking fun at privacy first people, but I don’t put any app on my phone that I didn’t pay for, or that doesn’t have code I can’t understand (I can’t understand code at all, but there’s a “flashlight widget 'app '” that’s like 50 lines long.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      I worked at a place that used customer phone numbers for internal market research in a less-scummy way.

      For instance, if the same customers (tracked by their phone number) purchased lots of X and Z, but not Y, we’d market X and Z together.

    • no banana@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I’m the kind of guy who’d let McDonalds read my emails if it gave me a free burger. The only one I don’t want in my private space is my guvermint.

      edit: damn, illegal to make jokes about privacy huh

  • Bezier@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 days ago

    I know batman isn’t the most realistic thing out there, but wtf was this shit?

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Not as farfetched as you might think. I literally have to watch what I say and where I go that might be playing a loud enough audio program, because all of it gets me relevant advertisements almost word for word on the subjects my phone has been in the vicinity of. Has happened way too often to be coincidence.

    • no banana@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      The funny thing is that the industry seems to float an even worse explanation than them actively listening: they already know what you’re going to be interested in based on usage patterns, and can figure out that you’ll be talking about those things approximately when you’re doing so. As such they show ads.

      • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Not entirely true for me simply because of media saturation. For instance there is more sports programming on air and online of which I have no interest in yet the news aggregators that I read often are flooded with the stuff despite my consistent attempts at removing it from my feeds

        • no banana@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Yeah I’m not saying that their explanation is entirely truthful. Just that it’s really fucking weird how they seem to believe that explanation to be less dystopian.