I highly doubt the left will do anything uncivil. How can they win back the country? Is it too late?

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      89
      ·
      2 months ago

      How in the fuck.

      Like what drives a majority of Americans to vote for a demented toddler. It’s insane.

      As a kid I always wondered how on Earth did Hitler ever make anyone follow himself, how did those people not realise. Turns out a majority of people are just fucking morons.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yep and the slow gutting of the education system isn’t making it any better.

        You have an entire generation coming of voting age who are rabid Trump supporters. They don’t care about policies or democracy or public institutions. They don’t care about healthcare, social securities, or the stability of the economy.

        They don’t care about any of the things that have been built up through generations. They lack critical thinking ability.

        The recipe works. If you make dumb kids they will vote for dumb people. It works so well that part of the future plan for a trump presidency is to get rid of the department of education. Solidifying the Republican party indefinitely.

        Without critical thinking and with mass media it’s so easy to say every problem that people deal with is because the “other side” made it so. Even if the other side has been doing everything possible to achieve the opposite.

        • HungryJerboa@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          2 months ago

          Americans aren’t special. They’re just as vulnerable to fascism as anybody else.

          The MAGATs might as well be wearing brownshirts and saluting like Mussolini.

        • Wooki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Blaming young people is up their with blaming immigrants and “gays” ect for [insert topic]. I would be very surprised if this was the case.

          I think it’s a little more nuanced.

            • Wooki@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              2 months ago

              You sure about that?

              You have an entire generation coming of voting age who are rabid Trump supporters.

              It goes on.

              Anecodtally (at this point, this is all these discussions are), I think that Apathy, fear campaigns or outright money and campaigns ect become powerful levers where voting is non-mandatory.

      • Coco@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are many leftists and minorities that have “voted strategically” time and time and time again only for things to get worse and worse.

        This kind of disenfranchisement leads to apathy and low turnout.

        We are told from a young age that our vote matters, and then when we are older we are told you can only vote for red fascist or blue fascist and many choose not to participate.

        There are more who did not vote than who voted for Trump. This is not what the majority wants, but with the system as it is, it is not possible for the majority to voice what they actually genuinely want and have a chance to get it.

        The votes do not have to be rigged at the ballot box for voting as a whole system to be rigged.

      • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The rise of the NSDAP has been studied quite a bit. Also, the psychological aspects are really interesting. Basically normal people can make all of this possible as long as the conditions are just right.

      • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        For all practical purposes, about 30% of people are unfeeling morons - basically psychopaths. That’s the number that consistently opposes abortion, for instance. Add to that all the dumbasses who don’t know any better (the undecideds on any extremely obvious moral issue), et voila. That’s how you get slavery, nationalism, genocide, theocracy, you name it.

        Unless people are willing to screen for psychopathy and remove it from the gene pool, the human species will keep fucking around until it finds out. Might be nuclear apocalypse or environmental collapse, but at this rate it’s inevitable.

          • yeahiknow3@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            “Oh no, we wouldn’t want the psychopaths with the broken brains not to exist. That’s eugenics.”

            You’re all fucking idiots.

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      And Harris has done worse than Biden in every county in America.

      Not every state. Every county.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          While I’m sure the statement “some Americans just don’t want a female president” is true, I think the vast majority of them were going to vote Republican basically no matter what.

          To paraphrase the conversation that took place on the left:

          “The DNC isn’t doing well among young straight white men and it’s getting worse. Barack Obama polled at 66% favorable among that demographic in 2008, and that number has fallen every election until now Harris is polling in the low 40s. There’s a lot of them, and we’re losing them.” A hot mic caught Kamala herself saying exactly that. “We’re losing men.”

          Responds the feminists, “Look at the pathetic men throwing a fit because they’re not fully in charge. Something something privilege something something patriarchy. Be better.” I’ll note this didn’t come from Kamala’s campaign, it came from the faceless rabble. The people who said “Yeah no we should probably also talk about issues that are important to men” got shouted down. So white men see that as “The people who vote for this candidate hate me no matter what, and yet they demand my vote no matter what.”

          Kamala started this race as Biden’s running mate, then Biden showed up in “mummified during the 6th dynasty of the Old Kingdom” condition at that first debate. No time for a primary, Biden’s out and Kamala’s in. Now she needs a running mate. They put out an APB for a white guy preferably from the south but the midwest will do. There was some brief discussion of North Carolina governor Roy Cooper, well-liked lame duck democrat from a former confederate state, ticks all those boxes. But we landed on Tim Walz. As far as I can tell he was a genuinely solid choice; I’d never heard of him before he was announced as a short runner for Harris’ running mate. Every headline I read about the guy was some new and exciting way he was a saint. Almost suspiciously so. He’s still the only one on the campaign trail who I’d lend a lawnmower to.

          Problem #1: We heard the APB as it went out. Here’s my turn to get shouted down: This works on women, muslims, and a significant number of black men, because those demographics have an automatic in-group dynamic. You see posts talking about “My boyfriend was talking to me at the gym and a woman I’ve never met before comes up to pretend to be my friend. I see u gurl.” So both Hilary and Kamala had the white chick vote sewn up just for existing while female. Obama, to a slightly lesser extent, had a similar effect among black men. That doesn’t work on white guys, or at least, the white guys that does work on are very reliable Republican voters.

          But, credit where credit is due, Walz seems like a solid guy. If they hadn’t announced out loud they picked him to identity pander I wouldn’t have noticed.

          Problem #2: The next time I saw Walz, he was on a commercial cosplaying as a straight white man. “Governor Walz here in a camouflage hat with a dog. Watch me perform a minor repair on an antique SUV.” They ran ads that literally said “I bet you’re tired of hearing how much white guys suck. I mean, some of them do…” That same ad says “They’re really talkin’ to guys like us.” No they weren’t.

          They ran ads talking about “I’m a REAL MAN and I’m MAN enough to vote for a WOMAN.”

          I didn’t see Tim Walz talking about “The boys who played on my football team are struggling to afford homes. They’re choosing not to get married or have children because for an increasing number of young men it’s just not in the cards.” No I heard a doughy guy dressed like a cowboy say “I eat carburetors for breakfast.”

          Among a male loneliness epidemic they ran an ad that said “Women will withhold sex unless you vote for Harris.”

          Obama polled well among young men because he engaged with them in their spaces. At the time, Facebook and Twitter were where the young people hung out, and he showed up there to talk to us, which was a welcome change from George W. “An internet” Bush. Obama campaigned on messages of hope and progress. I don’t recall Kamala herself really doing much actual reach-out, and her campaign messaging was either lazy attempts at pandering or naked feminist grievance airing. “We need you to show up and vote for us for the second decade in a row even though we’ve done nothing at all to measurably improve your lives in that time, when we had the power to do so we pissed it down your leg, and we’re okay saying out loud that we thoroughly hate you” has proven to be a losing campaign message.

          Turns out there are more straight white men than feminists and queers in the United States voter pool. Hilary proved it and Kamala proved it, pandering exclusively to the former while demanding the support of the former will lose an election to worn out diaper hitler.

            • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              If you look back at her primary in 2020, she was.

              Hard to wash that off with some last minute recanting, like with fracking and other such campaign claims.

              Her hand was tipped as to her ideal term in office 4 years ago, I’m surprised Trump didn’t use that shit in attack ads given how much more stereotypically progressive she was then.

              Personally I called it in when a clip of hers saying “we’ve got to get woke” (not sure about the wording but the word woke was used positively) from some talk show aimed at black people from this year came out.

              You need to live in a parallel dimension to think that word is not absolutely fucking nuclear waste in the political discourse rn.

        • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s actually incredible how they tried to copy Hilary Clinton’s campaign tactics of endorsements and warnings about Trump.

          That didn’t work last time. Why would it work now?

    • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      And I was so loving Lina Khan’s FTC, asking among other things…

      Edit: autocorrect