If you’re as big as Wendy’s you probably use volume licensing. While perpetual licenses are available via volume licensing, many businesses choose a subscription model instead. There’s advantages to both depending on your use case. Wendys corporate policies may also require a support contract from vendors, which can get pricy.

Typically something like a political campaign will use a dedicated texting service intended to send out mass texts. They’re not copy/pasting them on a consumer level cell phone account.

That person believes you are having a stroke, but I didn’t see anything wrong with your post. Seemed perfectly legible.

Especially egregious: someone quotes a Simpsons/South Park/whatever episode and the next 20 comments are people quoting the rest of the episode

We get it. You watched a hugely popular TV show. So did everybody. That’s why it was hugely popular.

Not true at all. The iPad excels at simple things and will do them much better than an ancient Thinkpad. The iPad cannot do specialized or complex things.

If they have a nub instead of a track pad, yes

Lexus is more reliable anyway

deleted by creator

Yeah, bots having the ability to jump instances when they’re banned makes us safer from bots

Apparently in this economy “unlimited” means “2 that you have to pick up off the floor”

Good. The book is incredible and while the schwartzneger movie could have been good schlocky fun on its own it’s a goddamn embarrassment as an adaptation.

Clerks

All amounts to the same thing.

That’s what I’ve been saying while you’ve been insisting that not choosing is somehow a third option. It’s not. It ends up being effectively “didn’t pull the lever”.

You seem desperate not to make the choice but the responsibility for that lack of choice still lies with you.

I haven’t chosen or refused to choose anything. I’m here to talk about your flawed interpretation of the trolley problem, nothing more.

Just as you were in a position to choose trump or Harris. So trump is as much your fault for failing to vote a viable alternative. As if you had chosen to vote him. Just because do not like either option dose not forgive you the effect of not choosing.

It seems you’re incapable of staying on topic so I am no longer interested in having a discussion with you.

You really seem to be failing to understand. And simple typos are easy to read around. I’m visually impaired so have little patience for that excuse.

It would probably help if the statement made sense to being with.

Pull or don’t pull. If you pull 1 person dies. If you don’t 5 die. There is no don’t kill.

“5 people die” is not the same as “I killed 5 people”. There is no option to kill the 5 people. They’re already dead unless you murder someone to save them.

As the guy in the signal box.

There’s no signal box nor is there verbiage in the trolley problem that implies you work for the railroad. You’re just a guy in a position to pull the lever. There’s no outside obligation to do anything at all.

Not voting leaves you with trump. Because you live in a fptp nation where 3rd parties just reduce the opposing vote.

I understand you want to crowbar the trolley problem into your metaphor about voting but I’m trying to stay on topic and discuss the problem itself.

Because the thought experiment recognises you live in a system where you have to make choices based on facts not your hopes and wishes.

No is not. It’s based on personal morality, whether an individual is willing to murder someone to save 4 others. The whole thing could be boiled down to “do the ends justify the means?”

“Thou shalt not kill” is a pretty straightforward commandment. No qualifiers, no exceptions. No “go ahead and kill if you believe you’re justified”.

Per the New testament so long as you accept Jesus afterward and repent you should be fine though.