“I’m going to do this unless I hear otherwise”

Don’t. We need to discuss it. I’m setting a meeting Monday morning with the 4 involved departments so we can settle that down. Is 9 to 5 ok for you or do you think we will need more time?

I don’t know the details of how your electoral system works. But if it’s possible to vote 3rd party for the legislative houses, you have a clear path you can exploit to make something change. (Independently of how people vote today.)

Cant you vote in more parties on the legislative elections?

Go prove nobody ever died programing in Rust.

“Why don’t you people blame the powerless at once?”

But will sharks be large fish exactly like the ones now, or smaller fish exactly like the ones now?

You are not filthy rich if you depend on a salary. And that’s not FU money basically anywhere.

3.0 and 2.0 are the same, aren’t they?

I remember that annoyingly, 3.1 and 2.1 relate differently and 3.2 is the one that everybody calls “USB 3”.

MS can’t force that one to use AI on development. But they can force almost everybody up.

“It doesn’t matter that we are burning 1 trillion dollars with no pat to revenue, because we will create God and it will make money meaningless.”

"Also, it will cure cancer and solve Global Warming. I know dumb people like you that can’t even get a trillion dollars to burn care about those things.

You are again reading it wrong.

To add up, we are close to that now with solar and batteries. But we are still not there.

And you can see the revolution going up all over the world. The US is resisting it a bit, but even there solar is gaining space.

Hum… Not from .world, I can’t.

(Or seriously, in Brazil you can’t legally watch it either.)

You just have to keep people tied up for the first 3 or 4 episodes. After that, they still won’t like the show, but will be invested into so many questions that the first 5 seasons will barely answer any amount of them.

You are missing the step where the experts weighted in and created an alternative capable of maintaining the same societal benefits with minimum losses. It’s between steps 1 and 2.

We are emitting more CO² now at a faster rate than ever before.

We are not, and that graph you posted does not measure that.

CO² emissions are higher now than ever.

And they are not either. That phrase has been true for almost every year of the last 3 centuries, but not this one.

Again, your graph does not measure the thing that you said. I’d guess that you are misinterpreting the data.

It won’t either. Class cold wars can get you some results, but hot wars are always damaging to everybody.

Those ones were right. We are solving it now, and we either finish solving it or our children will have to deal with resource depletion when their time to shine comes.

Either way, it’s not Global Warming that they will be solving.

I will never unsee it now… and I’m not even disappointed.

If you don’t have a dozen 1.5mm hex wrenches, is you life even worth living?