Just to add: some folders’ files might need modifications in the new system, e.g. .config/
Just to add: some folders’ files might need modifications in the new system, e.g. .config/
sway - stable and productive. Hyprland - beautiful, but performance is worse. i3 - same as sway, but sometimes better for legacy X11 stuff or applications that are still buggy at Wayland
Remove k-something-5? [y/N]
It’s easy to change display manager (except the case of keeping multiple of them to test out, if they are big and complex, like Gnome and KDE - there are conflicts). Some distros may have worse support for specific display managers, but I cannot say as my experience was relatively smooth for Debian, Manjaro, Arch, Endeavour and Artix. In Ubuntu I had some issues, but I could live with them for a time being because I couldn’t change the workplace OS.
But for init system it’s usually PITA. Many packages, including critical for system operation may have dependency on systemd, for example. In case of Artix Linux there are separate versions of packages for each init system that’s supported, if package has dependency on the init system.
Not only package manager - init system, wiki, display manager, community support, package freshness vs stability also play their role. There are many other points that are important too.
I would recommend EndeavorOS too, easy to install, sane config, nearly pure Arch.
Testing out Artix right now - I wanted to try out lightweight init system.
I wish they had 10 inch option. Something like GPD Win Max 2, but without gaming features
Gentoo LET’S GO