• 0 Posts
  • 65 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 22nd, 2025

help-circle




  • Ok I’ll take that. But now I still don’t understand how that particular cat photo meme can relate to proton decay or 10^1500 years. Like, the cat is looking me. So what.

    We could probably make something out of that cat being Schrodinger’s. But I don’t think that’s the point. The cat is outside the box, not inside. I mean, proton decay is quite precisely what Schrodinger’s cat is about, so I’m confused if it’s supposed to be Schrodinger’s cat or not.


  • betanumerus@lemmy.catoScience Memes@mander.xyzIf proton decay isn't true
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’m not asking about nuclear physics, I’m asking about where to draw the line between a meme and not a meme. The post is nothing but a few statements with a picture of a cat. I mean, using a cat picture as a bookmark for a science book would be the same thing but I wouldn’t call it a meme. If the cat was famous, maybe we’d have something but I don’t know him.