Yes, but sleep soundly at night on a big pile of money.
Yes, but sleep soundly at night on a big pile of money.
Yeah, I do not think Python is a very good comparison.
I was thinking more like Clojure:
Honestly, I think both are right. Both are simple languages that expand your way of thinking, and are probably both worth learning, if you’re into that sort of thing.
The random dumb people would still be bribed.
Bluesky seems to work better as an alternative.
Until they run out of VC money.
Then the enshittification happens, to pay the bills.
Wasn’t that Mitt Romney and Trump’s Secretary of the Treasury? (I forget his name.) But I remember him looking like a Bond villain.
About Esperanto, since it’s not a national language (intentionally so) it’s hard to do a census of speakers.
Also, to what level is considered “speaking Esperanto”? Taking the Duolingo course? Having it as a “mother tongue” where both parents speak it in a household in order to communicate? These are both probably countable, and produce wildly different numbers.
Mi pensas ke, vi volis tajpi, “Python (aŭ Pitono) malfeliĉigas min.”
“Mi malfeliĉas.” : I’m sad.
“Pitono malfeliĉigas ĉiujn.” (Python makes everyone sad.)
Ackshully, Clojure is Esperanto, and I will not be taking questions at this time.
“My pets aren’t spoiled. They are compensated fairly for the services they provide.”
Hot German potato salad is a thing.
There’s always an xkcd for every forum thread topic.
The more complex computers get, the greater probability that we are actually living in a simulation!
How about some A.I. bullshit in your browser?
“Just give me a plastic bottle of water.”
“Just give me a plastic bottle of water.”
“Just give me a plastic bottle of water.”
“Just give me a plastic bottle of water.”
I came here for this. Thanks for delivering!
It’s not my goddamned planet monkey-boy!
Does beer come with that?