

Jitsi Meet, but be aware that unless you are running it on a desktop in a chromium based browser, or its desktop app then it will not have end-to-end encryption as an option.
fae/she
Plural and not human, don’t refer to us as human in any way, we aren’t.
Never tell us what we’re feeling, why we’re doing something or what we are etc.
Bigots fuck off, you’re being ignorant assholes.
Ask more questions, assume less.
Jitsi Meet, but be aware that unless you are running it on a desktop in a chromium based browser, or its desktop app then it will not have end-to-end encryption as an option.
Oh heck, thanks so much!
We’ll give it a looksee sometime soon 🙂
Awh, thanks for the offer of help, much appreciated!
Awesome, thanks so much!
Thanks so much! There’s so many things saying we should self host, but seemingly no tutorials on how to do so for those of us with no knowledge on how to start, so we really appreciate the link!
Since you asked, even though it seems coming at it from bad faith then there’s many forms of non democratic decision making or even systems which get on well without making decisions that don’t fall in to oligarchy or monarchy or other forms of near ir actual authoritarianism.
Consensus, which could be seen as near democracy, but isn’t democracy since it requires all those making a decision to agree completely, not based on majority rule.
Some forms of anarchism do not really believe in democratic or oligarchic rule and don’t rely on any kind of formalised decision making.
Counter to popular belief there was a time in history before the creation of democracy which was not oligarchic or authoritarian etc (though I’m sure some may argue it was) which was based on asking elders who had knowledge and wisdom about what to do in certain situations, like harsh winters etc. It probably continues today in some form. Today and in the past it is/was usually as equally non authoritarianism based since if they stopped being trustworthy then they stopped being listened to. Sadly this is incorrectly often called ‘tribal government’.
Then there’s also just general co-operation without a formal decision making system.
Finally, for now, there’s those that will go there own way if they don’t agree with a particular decision, which is a perfectly acceptable way of doing things instead of coming to blows or pointlessly arguing it out.
Here’s some further reading and listening for you:
Okay, where’s a complete beginners guide on hosting, setting up a server etc, assuming no knowledge?
We are aware what it means and honestly, we genuinely believe that in many cases democracy is not the best fit for making decisions. So no, not in fact bad faith, ignoring your ridiculous and pointless attempts at insulting us without even knowing us.
It’s okay for us to hold different opinions, doesn’t mean we are incorrect.
Ah, thanks!
Thanks for explaining! We appreciate it!
We think it’s more pointing out that democracy itself is flawed. Tyranny of the majority.
Sorry it has been a long time since we have seen the show. What do you mean?
Oh, that sounds a bit dire. We hope it allows us to rebel completely.
Completely agree.
Hmmmm, a bit confusing it’s a dating sim if it’s meant to be about an AroAce person, but it’s somewhat understandable if somebody is trying to figure themselves out.
Might check it out once it’s complete (early access is too hard to trust especially with a newly made studio).
Yes! We get tired of ‘leftists’ who think there will need to be ae form of currency in the future and we always wonder why. If the systems and incentives are better then why would there need to be? Maybe in a transition period, but after that? I just don’t see it as necessary.
Not really, closest is Jitsi Meet or Element Call. Personally I think and have experienced video calling on federated services are/as abismal though, you’re better off sticking to centralised like Signal.
Yeah, that’s definitely one of the things they do. However, that’s not the only thing. They have a ‘better than you’ attitude in general and pretty much stick to the status quo.
Yes.
You can, I did and it was fine. It’s really not their job to do it, they really do not have to, as long as they don’t do anything themselves it’s not like an empolyer can prove they’re lying or would even bother wasting their time trying to, at least in our experience. Just keep their heads down and focus on the work they get paid for and nothing else.
The BBC are transphobic assholes that also like to pretend that being ‘unbiased’ is A: possible and B: a good thing. I can see the hatred and judgement dripping and seething through their writing though.
[sarcasm] The solution is obvious then, just don’t love others then. [/sarcasm]
No, but seriously, the best thing is to be stronger, move to platforms etc without control, spying and disgusting incentives and algorithms, and if you truly care for others show them how to use those too.
It’s not easy but it can be done. That’s truly love.
Nope I’m an left anarchist who just happens to have different views to you. But since you, as most leftist do, wish to pointlessly argue with me, instead of trying to come to some kind of understanding this conversation is pointless.
I do hope you work on your apparent automatic anger and desire to argue instead of trying to reach understanding with those who have different understandings and views to you.
I also hope you have a nice life.