

Why would include infra costs when I’m not using Spotify to play the music?


Why would include infra costs when I’m not using Spotify to play the music?


I got this from spotube it has a stats tab.


Reminder you can use apps like spotube to stream music for free without giving Spotify a cent.
You can also use those savings to go to local shows, although going to one show a year is likely giving more to artists than streaming will.



Rare SC W.
Corporate interests 🤝 Pirate interests


Great tips, i’d add to remember who your target audience is, if you’re tool is designed for end users, prioritize how to use it over technical details (& the opposite).


Looking forward to the text editing capabilities it’s the one thing that keeps me using other tools, they look more than powerful enough for me


JFC did you even read the article you linked to. What’s the point in talking to people hyperventilating so hard you don’t read your own sources.
Even proposals that may not explicitly mandate age verification


How do I come back at someone pointing out i can’t/don’t read and am hyperventilating over laws that don’t exist outside of my mind? Call everyone a fed.
~ Litterally you & Alex Jones


. Fort Lauderdale
You know this is a California law we are talking about right?
I guess when everything is a 7th dimensional alien invasion to you, little things like geography don’t matter.


If the hyperventilators could read that would be a very good point.


WTF are you on about?
Incapable of reading comments and engaging clearly in serious discussions.
I’d be happy to engage in serious discussion but you’re working on Alex Jones level, veins throbbing over an optional field in systemd


I think it’s good that they’re banning this hysterical spam.


I don’t. The people I know in real life don’t take lightly to the changes.
Yeah because they likely got misinformation about it from you, and nodded along because Alien rectal probes sound bad.
With ID verification and other methods of age verification you absolutely can unmask users online if states demand APIs be implemented.
Good thing there is no ID verification in the PR.
You sound like a narc btw!
You sound like Alex Jones!


the vast majority of Linux users vehemently reject?
I think you vastly over estimate the importance of the reddit/lemmy-sphere freaking out over this.
And the more insane the slippery slopes you imagine skiing down, the less seriously you’re taken. The fact that there isn’t a serious programmer making a fork and instead y’all promoted a slopfork from someone who didn’t read the docs, should be a wakeup call for how unserious y’all are.
If it’s the vast majority of Linux users, how come there was not one that’s read the systemd docs?
I honestly don’t care that much about the law eitherway but the hyperventilating over a milktoast law is something else, it makes me think maybe we should age gate higher.


Will you still say that when aliens from the 19th Dimension verify your age rectally?


AIbros: we’re creating God!!!
AI users: it can do translation & reformating pretty well but you got to check it’s not chatting shit


Just so I got this straight I’m a Fed simping magat, because I think you’re being hysterical about a Californian law that doesn’t require verification and returns a locally stored unverified age?
I’m honestly kind of neutral on the law but the hysteria around it as a slippery nipple to completely different laws is ridiculous.


California is a blue state


Lmao, you realize it’s a state law right?
It works for me know but every now and again it breaks and I need to mess with the plugins it’s using.