no it doesn’t. it only says the weights and information about the training data must be open, not the training data itself. which is honestly useless.
no it doesn’t. it only says the weights and information about the training data must be open, not the training data itself. which is honestly useless.
this is the attack on stallman
seems prett damning to me
also i’m going to let devault himself rebut this
also no: stallman being under attack for credible accusations and even non-retracted public statements is not an “attack on free software” but a much needed clean up. call it a refactoring of legacy assets, if you want.
In austrian german dialect, “Mit da Ua, draht ma zua.” which in standard german would be “Mit der Uhr, dreht man zu.” and in english “With the clock, turn it closed.” or something like that.
BUT IT’S A SINGLE BINARY! UNACCEPTBLE!!! THE BLOAT OF IT ALL!
it was a joke xD i like busybox (and systemd) i don’t particularly subscribe to the unix way, but to each their own ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
“Noooooooo! One tool should do one thing and one thing only! Blasphemy! Heresy! Anthema! Systemd!” crying in unix design philosophy
swearing is pretty normal in austria. I know a few people who don’t swear and it’s even somewhat weird.
that’s iceland. they don’t have potholes, because none of their streets get very old, see exhibit A
that’s your interpeetation. what’s missing for me is “must be freely (as in not only by specific entities) obtainable”. with this wording i could just say: “this data is not obtainable” and be done with it.