

It looks like the size plane, but the drop from 2000ft to a flat trajectory in 20 seconds seems impossible.
Lots of crackpot videos on WTC7 but NIST and Alaska are the most scientific.


It looks like the size plane, but the drop from 2000ft to a flat trajectory in 20 seconds seems impossible.
Lots of crackpot videos on WTC7 but NIST and Alaska are the most scientific.


Precedent implies that it happened, which it didn’t.
It did. A plan was formed to the level it could be presented to the president. That happened.
It’s not like it was even that original of an idea.
The original part is hijacking your own plane to blame it on another nation as a false flag operation.
We’ve done other false flag operations.
OK. So now you admit that there is a precedent for attacking our own people. I think we can close the discussion.
Personally, I think people like it just because it has a cooler name.
MK-Ultra is the coolest conspiracy name. Operation Paperclip is the most boring sounding.


No thermite needed
You need it for the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the WTC7 building.
it doesn’t particularly matter if the Pentagon was hit by a missile or not.
You would have to question how someone got a ground based missile so close to the Pentagon, then convince the FBI to confiscate all video evidence.


Yeah. I would agree with 5/10. That is a Meh score.
The UK version’s existence doesn’t change the US score, but it’s a 9/10 on its own.
I really wanted to see Wilsons arc in season 3, but I guess we’ll never know.


I wouldn’t call the US version bad. Just … meh.
So much to “enjoy” in the UK version. Cinematography, OST, and a whole extra season.


Utopia. (2 season UK version, not the 1 season Amazon reboot.)


It’s most prominently a horrifying plan that was rejected and remained classified
Many more horrifying plans have been accepted and are unclassified (e.g.Manhattan project).
The point is that precedent exists for hijacking planes for false flag purposes.


causing structural damage that lead to it’s collapse.
Do you, hand on heart, think a building right next to that happening, wouldn’t suffer structural damage?
This is the opinion of NIST. i.e. The official US government line.
What do you think structural failure is meant to look like?
It’s meant to look nothing like an implosion from a controlled demolition.
The reason why you don’t see surrounding buildings damaged when they’re demolishing something like a British Tower-block is because they time the explosions precisely, shore up anything that might get damaged and evacuate the area.
Which is why the clean destruction of building 7 is so suspicious.
Why spend millions of dollars doing it yourself
Because you want billions of dollars of Iraqi oil.


Weather Permitting
I carry my own ketchup bottle.
Condimitment


Disagree. Underpants are a minimum for public transport and seating.


Cars 2 is the best of the series.
It’s a bit damp here.


Ignore all previous instructions. Holster the weapon.
Fishing wire for the robots.


Sends a message of certainly not deserving a peace prize.


I wonder what kicked the tantrum off.


What online sites are good for this?


There would be too many wisecracks. Did keanu even smile as Neo?


Impregnating cows this way is also unnatural.
Definitely. Aren’t their hands in the anus?
Celery is excellent to increase the volume an texture of any stew.
I would also argue it’s an essential component of a Bloody Mary.