The seed for the random number generator isn’t usually exposed to the user. Also the AI service providers regularly update the model and/or weights, producing different outputs.

If you are running your own LLM on your own hardware you can guarantee repeatablity, but that’s not what your average Joe does.

So far I have semi-competent voice transcription

Lucky you. When I use voice transcription my English gets automatically translated into Welsh.

Agreed. The word “patterns” is an important qualification. LLMs are great for one off tasks, but not as part of a repeatable process.

Depends on your use case. Adding 0.000001*rand() to a large number retains the functionality as a calculator.

Your argument that AI isn’t useful may be valid, but claiming that AI is not repeatable is false.

Even as a tool it lacks predictability / reproducability

If you use the same seed on the same model with the same weights you get the same results.

The Seal of Solomon = The Star of David.

That’s not a star of david

The masonic seal of Solomon is directly referencing the star of David.

it wasn’t added for the film.

The location was chosen for the film and the 6 pointed star was in shot unaltered.

That’s the floor of the Freemasons Hall in London.

Its filmed in Australia House.

“Go to red alert!”

“Are you sure Sir? That does mean changing the bulb”

The films added the stereotypes. They made the goblins hooked nosed and added a Star of David decoration to the greengots bank floor.

It’s not in the books but Rowling still had huge control over the film so retains responsibility.

Wearing a dress and moustache.

No one who does not wear their pants on their head uses an LLM to make trades

LMMs are better than other methods at context and nuance for sentiment analysis. They can legitimately form part of trade generation.

By us

Didn’t scientists just prove a unified theory was impossible?

After the killing of all the warrant canaries in the US, Serbian headquarters seems like a pro rather than a con.

$999

Variety people are fine until they bring out the juggling balls and fire sticks.

I certainly recognise the argument that the film was zionist propaganda. I’m just highlighting that Sandlers public zionism is quite liberal.

I’ll take a 1947 border zionist over a 2025 settler zionist any day.

On the other hand, if all zionists were like Zohan then the middle east would be a much more pleasant place.

doop, monologue, momo, moron, zoom, lilly, BOOP, noon, nexon

All these are aesthetically pleasing to me.

Not sure arguing about the correct racist terminology is productive.