On Lemmy itself it hasn’t been implemented, though there is an issue related to it on their github. There are clients that do it but it’s client-side only at the moment.
Orientation: Aromantic Asexual (AroAce)
Identity + Gender Modality: Agender + Isogender (Please note I don’t identify as cis or Trans)
Pronouns: Use any, Idc, *mostly doesn’t really matter to me (just not it/its).
On Lemmy itself it hasn’t been implemented, though there is an issue related to it on their github. There are clients that do it but it’s client-side only at the moment.
That’s one big problem with political discussions, everyone having them thinks their own views are the correct ones. Then there’s the problem of politics in international communities, did you know that what’s right and left can be entirely different in different countries and different cultures?
It’s why I avoid political discourse and I try not to refer to myself or others as right or left.
block the porn communities or disable NSFW, that’s what I did (at least before lemmy.blahaj.zone defederated from them)
It’s not a load problem though, it’s because some loser is DDoSing the server. Doesn’t hurt to move to other instances where it isn’t happening but the real solution would be to find who’s doing this so they can be brought to justice (or silenced from the internet forever, whichever is easier).
Please tell others to stop misrepresenting this issue, it is an attack, not a user overload problem and nobody who’s misrepresenting it that way is doing anyone any favors except the attackers by presenting it as such. Instead it should be presented as what it is.
I don’t care what anyone says I still think this style is cool and I’m 27 years old. Maybe it’s an Enby/Agender thing though, I don’t know.
So you don’t think people who post hateful stuff about trans people or deliberately spread dangerous or hateful misinformation, or people who spam multiple comments at once should be banned from the platform (or at the very least have their comments actioned by mods)? I’m saying that because Reddit originally intended the Downvotes system to be used to combat those specific types of scenarios, they said it was to control spam and malicious actors. These are things that should be dealt with using disciplinary action i.e. being booted.
If it was an agree/disagree system like many people think it is they wouldn’t have added rate limiting to people with low or negative Karma or made it so communities can set karma restrictions. Even so I don’t really think it’s a good method either, it’s almost just a softer less obvious form of shadowban.
Karma sucked ass on Reddit. Essentially people could ban you from participating because you pissed too many people off even though you didn’t break any rules.
Karma count is an ass kissing metric, high karma shows that you kiss people’s asses for upvotes, low or negative karma shows that people dislike what you say which is absolutely ok. People having different opinions vs going with the group is the difference between a healthy platform and an echo chamber.
By the way Trolls and malicious actors who that system is targeting should be dealt with directly. If someone’s posting hateful transphobia instead of downvoting their acount they should just be BANNED from the community or the platform as a whole, keep bad people out of the community.
I can’t tell if you’re being genuine or sarcastic.