I don’t believe any consumer available software is capable of defending from nation state attacks. Physical access or not.

They still won’t be able to read chats themselves.

It’s not sotred in plain text, but encrypted.

Meta data is still available

Can you elaborate on the Gripen?

Edit: my ore-coffee dyslexic ass read just like the Gripen.

I fully support Canada getting manufacturing here…

I think the problem is your second assumption of “will continue releasing sources” is the one to fail.

Your going to be dissapointed then.

He’s very toxic.

He has gotten help

That being said, I still love the guy. But he is a known hot head.

Sure, if your physically able to do it all that is.

Things like these are important to disabled folks.

Because libertarians are the first to remove legal protections in the name of small government. This isnt a blanket rule, more anecdotal than anything. But the ones I’ve managed to find and interact with all want to remove all sorts of legal protections.

The party doesn’t seem to represent those that I’ve interacted with. I get what your saying, but that just doesn’t match with who I’ve interacted with.

Okay so here’s where I interject more opnion than above.

libritarians miss the forest for the trees. From your opinion above you say fiscal responsibility. But you deney the help that social programs provide, and actually benift the economy. Poor people spend stimuls checks locally more than higher income brackets for example. Government serves people, not commerce.

And it’s important to know, if that’s your attitude, your gonna get laughed out of every open source circle.

Why the fuck would I when your this hostile?

Also since you complained no one looked at your code, you have support for plain text passwords in your code. That’s a huge no no.

Hokay. So docker does run as root. Podman can run rootless, but docker does run as root.

So if you have any vulnerabilities in your code, like say remote code execution, than your app already has access to root.

Also, don’t pretend like your shit don’t stink. My code has bugs. And I’ve been at this a a decade. Your vibe coded thing isnt going to be secure because you probably don’t even know how to make it secure if you don’t know docker runs as root.

Here’s where I interject my opnion

Its fine to do this for yourself. If you wanted to hear how great your AI produced slop go to LinkedIn.

When you share things to be used by others, you have a responsibility yourself. How will you monitor and package up security updates? What kind of depenecinies do you have? Are they up to date? Do they have any CVEs?

There’s so much more to publishing than good intentions. Its fine to do something like this for yourself. But to publish and then absolve yourself of any responsibility is not a way to get taken seriously.

You say the open source line, and then apply it to a project that doesn’t value those values.

Free as in freedom comes without restrictions like commercial use.

If that low bar of source avaialble (last I checked you have to request the source). That’s fine.

But for a lot of FOSS people its not because it means you can never learn from the code, and apply it in your paying job. Or in your own project that suddenly gets big. Then suddenly someone is knocking demanding money.

Its about the community as much about the code.

Yes, however those aren’t “copy left” licenses like AGPL whose defining feature is the owner not holding copyright

Do you think it’s genetic? Like we will still learn about Nazis, and so long as we do there will be people who agree with it.

Once you go copy left, you need everyone’s consent to change the license.

The MIT license is the creator owns the copyright, and any changes you contribute are licesned under the sam MIT as the project.

So to go from MIt -> anything only requires the consent of the project onwer.

Any copy left (like AGPL) license -> anything requires every contributors consent.

It is possible, but practically infeasible at scale.

I’d have to read more about AGPL, but IIRC GPLv2 says you must license any derived code as the same license.

IANAL, just someone whose looked into this before.

Copyright.

AGPL says that the original author of any chunk of code owns the copyright to it.

Meaning to change the license you have to get every copyright holder (read every developer who has contributed code) to agree to the license change and give over the copy right.

Edit: to be clear, I don’t like FUTO either. As a visible minority, I know libertarians are not my friends. But a copyright rug pull is hard to do in immich.

Yes those Greenlanders should be able to read all of Wikipedia without learning English and even if the project has no human translators

Again, your assuming a high level of accuracy from these tools. If LLM garbage leaves it unreadable, is that actually better?

Is it even getting misused? Spreading knowledge via machine translation where there are no human translators available, had to be better than not translating. As long as there is transparency so people can judge the results

Assumes the AI is accurate, which is debatable

Also how do you do citations on a translation?

Its an interpretation, not a fact

Yes, the argument is about spending money to migrate, because how else do we decouple the single points of failure, if not to migrate away?

Remember, this is a capatistic hellscape. Everything is about money.

Sure, but how much money is that worth to an individual company? Because migration is not easy or cheap. And your not getting more reliability…