- 0 Posts
- 89 Comments
you have no idea about how scientific method works. It’s the furtherst thing from being dogmatic and claiming to know everything. When you look at modern science, you don’t look at a “that was like this” statement, it’s more of “that’s what we discovered so far, it’s weird, so we re-checked it with every method availeble to us, here’s all the data we have and how we checked it”.
I dare you to read at least one actual scientific article before you claim anything about modern science. It’s easy to badmouth it and fentasize about your own reality when all you read are nothing more than rewrites and interpretations of said articles, made by journalists that want to write front-pagers, not to represent the data correctly and substantionally.
also there’s a new critical vulnerability found every year, that will burn your fucking phone in the best case
that would explain what Stephen Hawking was doing on the list
you’re right, it’s time to move onto the next target
81·10 days agoso good that i actually get more fps than i did so on windows
10·12 days agoyeah, i got that at least. What’s up with it in America tho?
can someone explain pls?
“Allright buddy, I’m going to shit yourself”
i’d assumed, you’ve asked for yourself in the first place, so i answered in kind to my assumption.
i’m more of a bash fan tbh. Ever since i started using linux, python started to irritate me
it’s a turn off for him when people leave the bathroom
to be fair, out of those three, jq invokes the least existential dread in me
god bless the old world, i’m yet to see chromeos in person
commands for your distro’s package manager is a must i think. If you’re a basic user with basic needs, i don’t really thik you need anithing beside that.
there is such a thing as Postmarket OS. Don’t know how well it flies, but it’s a linux for smartphones
your analogy doesn’t quite work here tbh.
It’s not a transparent lock, a transparent lock would be easy to pick. It’s more of a usual lock, but everyone can see all the blueprints and changes done to them. You can make changes to the blueprints yourself, and if the locksmiths approve of it, the next iteration of the lock will have them included.
Everyone who’s in the set of users of OSS software can contribute, therefore the set of people in control of the software that want it to have no backdoors whatsoever is always larger than the set of people who want to let the backdoors in, unlike in closed source, where corporate can singlehandedly decide to include a backdoor on purpose, not to mention, lots of OSS projects have such a large quantities of different people working on them, corpos won’t be able to gather so much humanpower under a single project ever.