

That place you were going to will owe to give you the thing you want as a reward for your effort. This is exactly how the world works.


That place you were going to will owe to give you the thing you want as a reward for your effort. This is exactly how the world works.
I prefer Borking News and it’d just be videos of dogs.
Also, 30 years and he didn’t bother with a cover up?
If I was doomed to spend my entire life alone in a spaceship, and the only memento I have from another human being (even if they are my clone) is some stupid ass tattoos on my face - I’d want to keep these tattoos.
Don’t be ridiculous. Where would they get sunlight in England?


Does the ad money in this case go to the creators of the content displayed on these displays, or does it go to Amazon who also got money from selling these displays?
It means bigger than a third pounder, right?
Isn’t this basically what influencers do?
Neovim has something better - there is a plugin that installs the servers for you - https://github.com/mason-org/mason.nvim - and then you can just use the servers that plugin has installed (which should be more trustworthy because you just need to trust the plugin and not some random executable)
There is also https://github.com/mason-org/mason-lspconfig.nvim which bridges the two and automatically enables servers that were installed via Mason.
made it costly for colors to attend
Are you sure that’s the right link? The Wikipedia page talks about a law that mandates a permit for carrying firearms.
The LSP support itself is builtin in Neovim (not in Vim though, AFAIK), but each language server needs to be configured and activated. There is a plugin with all(ish) configurations - https://github.com/neovim/nvim-lspconfig - and activation is done with a vim.lsp.enable("server-name") command, which you just put in your config and the Neovim will start the LSP when you open a relevant file.
This is not about mistakes in the Git-managed code. This is about mistakes in the Git commands themselves. Anything that involves merging/rebasing/conflict resolution can potentially be botched. These mistakes are usually fixable, but:
The theory behind this trick is that you are refining the part of its knowledge base it’ll use. You are basically saying “most of the examples you were trained on was written by idiots and is full of mistakes, so when you answer my query limit yourself to the examples that have no mistakes”. It sounds stupid but apparently, to some extent, it kind of works?
That life hack didn’t work for Persephone.


Dr. Seuss would be proud.
The conmen whom you question will make the effort to color your skepticism as demeaning and rude.


A phone can do a lot. Much much more than ENIAC era supercomputer (I think you’ll have to get pretty close to the end of the previous century to find a supercomputer more powerful than a modern smartphone)
What a phone can’t do is run an LLM. Even powerful gaming PCs are struggling with that - they can only run the less powerful models and queries that’d feel instant on service-based LLMs would take minutes - or at least tens of seconds - on a single consumer GPU. Phones certainly can’t handle that, but that doesn’t mean that “cant’ do anything”.
Maybe, but they’re cats, not dogs. Looking after them is not as nearly as much time consuming.