I save this meme a while ago, I think it is from Reddit

  • Murdo Maclachlan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Image Transcription: Meme


    [The meme shows two fanart images of the character Sayori, from “Doki Doki Literature Club”, with text to the right of each image.]


    [In the first image, Sayori is wearing sunglasses and scowling, with her hand up in a blocking gesture. The text reads:]

    Anti-Cheat


    [In the second image, Sayori has her head up high, looking pleased, with a finger pointed to the right, where the text reads:]

    Kernel Level Surveillance


    I am a human who transcribes posts to improve accessibility on Lemmy. Transcriptions help people who use screen readers or other assistive technology to use the site. For more information, see here.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wanna know they have to have low level shit making these checks on my device in the first place. Why can’t the checks by on the god damn server, checking against what the developer knows is and isn’t possible to do without cheating?

    Edit: Er… I guess you wouldn’t really be able to tell if they used walls or aimbots that way… 🤔

    • Yen@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of anticheat methods are not to catch the people with the proper, premium cheating software. It’s to stop little Jimmy downloading an exe for Fortnite because he loses too much and making a new account as f2p is now the norm. As such, a lot goes into making it hard to have a cheat hide itself without significant effort from the user, be that running a custom kernel module yourself or some sort of emulation techniques. The kernel level anticheats can naturally be bypassed, but you have to do more than just running an exe most of the time which is about as far as the average kid who downloads their cheats from a YouTube video is capable of. The result is you catch 99.9% of what would be cheaters, and that’s a much bigger improvement to your player base than catching the 4 players at the pro level who pay thousands a month for custom software which doesn’t really matter in the grand scheme of things.

  • AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been in discussions regarding anti-cheats, and there’s definitely an audience who outright complains if a game does not have anti-cheats.

    The arguments usually being willing to deal with the risks, because they don’t see a way to make games fair without it.

  • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As long as there are people playing a game, there will be cheats. However, I decide what happens on my device, not a game or software developer. When the developer thinks he can set requirements, he is barred.

    Not a single piece of software is worth risking my device for.

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve played before anticheat was a thing and it is meaningless. Cheaters are going to cheat. The best anticheat systems are voting. The game kicks a winning vote total and then that server sends the rest of the servers it’s results. Then that account is flagged as a cheater. The only way a cheater can exist is they hide and don’t cheat and are obvious in it