In my observation, a big part of social progress is each generation pointing out the hypocrisy of the previous. “All men are created equal” so how can you enslave black people? If men can vote, why can’t women? How come straight people can marry but gay people can’t? How is it fair to send an 18 year old to war but not let him vote?

A lot of these hypocrisies were so internalized that a lot of people of previous generations never even thought about them. It was like a mental blind spot. It took young people with fresh thinking to point them out and fight to fix them.

So, speaking as a Millenial, I’m asking what my generation’s blind spots are. What injustices are we perpetuating without even thinking much about it?

For reference, Millenials are currently in their late 20s to early 40s. Not running the world, but also not fresh eyed college grads.

  • Cryophilia@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    Veganism, or at least vegetarianism, was the first thing that crossed my mind. I bet future generations will not look kindly on us for eating meat. And yet still, I can’t turn down a good burger.

    • metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      until we have a viable alternative it’s a choice between your ethics or your health and I don’t think we can begrudge anyone for choosing either one, especially when industrial agriculture make both option equally terrible.

      a single cow can feed a single human for a year. eating meat isn’t the problem it’s the incredible amount of food waste and disrespect for the sacrifice that will be looked down upon.

      • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Even if we do keep eating meat eating cows is about as wasteful as it gets. People should get over themselves and forget about their steaks once and for all. It truly is a disgusting practice of the same magnitude of environmental and ethical harm as burning fossil fuels to fuel your insane shopping addictions.

        • metaStatic@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          it’s like arguing over different types of combustion engines. at the end of the day we need to feed 8 billion people and it simply isn’t possible without industrial food production. and cows could be the best option because saturated fat is the most energy dense food but people only want to eat that 1 cut they like so we get the situation we’re in now where cows are almost the worst possible option.

          I say almost because at lest they aren’t being ground up alive in a combine harvester so people can feel smug about not eating that meat.

      • Timwi@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I’m gonna go out on a limb and say that you probably haven’t even looked for any viable alternatives, because if you had, you would have found they are plentiful already. They’re just expensive because of the government subsidizing animal farming, not because they’re expensive to produce.

        • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          They’re not even expensive. If you cook at home, a vegetable-based diet is a fraction of the cost of a meat-based one.

          I was vegan by choice for over a year, then went back to vegetarianism; and then nearly vegan for many more years because I was too broke to afford animal products (though also too broke to refuse them if they were free).

          Now I’m well-off, and I still keep my grocery budget low by avoiding animal products, especially meat.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            If you cook at home, a vegetable-based diet is a fraction of the cost of a meat-based one.

            Highly dependent on where you live. In some places, vegetables are more expensive than meat.

            • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Where? Alaska? I grew up in South Dakota –dairy and ranching country– and veggie, legumes, grains were way less expensive than meat, even in winter.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Food deserts. Some places I grew up in, it was difficult to find fresh veggies at all, much less affordable ones. Even canned and frozen was about the same as meat.

        • metaStatic@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          if it was viable it’s all you would hear about from militant internet vegans … and I wouldn’t even be mad.

          • midnight@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            First of all, it’s perfectly viable to just not eat meat. Tons of people don’t eat meat and are perfectly healthy.

            If you need meat replacements, (which is for taste, let’s be clear) there are a TON of good substitutes, for example Beyond.

            Also to your previous point, food waste is a big problem, but thermodynamically, meat IS food waste. Only a fraction of the energy of animal feed is present in the meat, which is super resource intensive and environmentally terrible (not to mention all the methane produced)

            • Cryophilia@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Meat substitutes are horrible replacements in terms of taste. Let’s just clarify that. Question anyone who likes them enough and you’ll eventually find out that they always disliked real meat, or they haven’t eaten real meat in decades.

              But correct. Meat is not needed at all.

              • Timwi@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I’m afraid I’m gonna be the counterexample to your theory. I liked most forms of meat; my favorites were chicken, ground beef, and fish fingers. However, once I discovered plant-based (mostly soy-based) substitutes, I genuinely prefer them. I’m still not fully vegan but I’m no longer buying meat because this stuff is so much better. I also prefer oat milk over cow milk and am kind of annoyed I didn’t try it sooner because it’s so much better (esp. in hot chocolate).

                • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  I would’ve been a vegan 100% if I could at all eat soy and legumes. I’ve had a godly meal once at a vegan friend’s house, it was so delicious, but I can’t eat that regularly sadly. I stick to chicken and fish though, no other animal proteins in my diet. Can’t wait for lab-grown meat to push out all the rest honestly.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  In a large enough population base, there will be individuals who deviate significantly from the norm, and they are statistically not relevant.