Screenshot of this question was making the rounds last week. But this article covers testing against all the well-known models out there.

Also includes outtakes on the ‘reasoning’ models.

    • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think the “fancy auto complete” meme is a disingenuous thought stopper, so I speak against it when I see it.

      I can respect that. I’ve criticized it plenty myself too. I think this is just me knowing my audience and tweaking my language so at least the important part of my message gets through. Too much nuance around here usually means I spend the rest of my day responding to accusations about views I don’t even hold. Saying anything even mildly non-critical about AI is basically a third rail in these parts of the internet.

      These systems do seem to have some kind of internal world model. I just have no clue how far that scales. Feels like it’s been plateauing pretty hard over the past year or so.

      I’d be really curious to try the raw versions of these models before all the safety restrictions get slapped on top for public release. I don’t think anyone’s secretly sitting on actual AGI, but I also don’t buy that what we have access to is the absolute best versions in existence.

        • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Have you tried running your own local llm?

          Nah, I’ve only messed around with ChatGPT and Grok. My interest in AI originates from the philosophical side of it - mainly the dangers and implications of creating AGI. I’m not tech-savvy enough for anything deeper - I even needed ChatGPT to walk me through installing Linux.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      think the “fancy auto complete” meme is a disingenuous

      “LLMs don’t have human understanding or metacognition”

      Then what’s the (auto-completing) fucking problem? It’s just a series of steps on data. You could feed it white noise and it would vomit up more noise. And keep doing it as long as there’s power.

      Intelligent?

        • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Instead it tries to make sense of it. Why? Because it learned strong language priors from us and it leans on that when the prompt is meaningless. It tries to make sense of it.

          No, it doesn’t. You’re in sci-fi land. There is no “it” “trying to make sense”. That cogitation is happening in YOU, not the motherboard.

            • Iconoclast@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Sure, there’s no ghost in the machine - but that’s true of your neurons too.

              Touché.

              Intelligence doesn’t require “self” and we’re a living proof of that. The way LLMs and humans operate have much more similarities than people like to admit. We’re just applying higher standards to AI.