As the title says I live in a surveillance state where among other things the government uses paid snitches, listening devices in your home, installs Trojans/malware in your phone and computer, even outside agents can stalk and observe you 7/24.

I may not be a target of any of this as I am didn’t commit any of the crimes required to do these (for example being involved with cannabis, or helping illegal aliens or some crimes that actually warrant this like organized crime and so forth)

However with the snitch system were convicted criminals are incentivized to incriminate others to save their own skin I am not put at ease with assurances that if you have nothing to hide that you would have nothing to fear.

I do not believe however that the surveillance state is intended to prevent terrorism or organized crime. I believe the true intention of the surveillance state is to consolidate power and nip any sort of true dissent in the bud.

So in imho if you were to call out the government on their bullshit you would stand to be victimized. Even if you are well within your rights with regards to freedom of speech/thought/assembly.

So if everything on your computer may be subject to government’s prying eyes, you’d need your own language and alphabet/writing system to at least retain the ability to keep notes and write a diary.

I would like to be able to note down my thoughts without having to fear the government can read it.

I was thinking of something like Tolkiens Elven tongue/language. I know it is a lot of work especially since it is only for internal use.

What’s your opinion on this?

  • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    10 months ago

    Any unencrypted language is crackable; if you are simply using an alphabet to obscure English, it will be immediately broken simply due to frequency analysis of the the letters and word lengths. A whole unencrypted language is harder but there will be plenty of context clues to crack it. Encryption is by far the best way to ensure privacy.

      • CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Not definitively. Ancient Egyptian hyroglyphics withstood it for a while but the Rosetta Stone cracked it (also I suspect modern computing would have done so by now anyway). The Voynich Manuscript is uncracked but there is a hypothesis that it gibberish, an uncracked natural language, or a ciphertext (encrypted).

        • AnarchistsForDemocracy@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          So there is no way of knowing, if any non-cracked language might just be gibberish.

          I am really surprised that even languages like sumerian and ancient egyptian and ancient south american languages were translated. I guess language has to follow certain rules, and these allow them to be translated.

          this in turn would mean that our own contemporary languages like english, han, hindi would be deciphered by alien invadors (I know not likely lol). In turn we would be able to decipher any alien language we might come across in the future and be it just in the form of an intercepted age old radio broadcast from a distant system.

          • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            You need some sort of reference point to translate a language. The rosetta stone allowed for linguists to get their foot in the door for ancient egyptian because the same text was written three times in ancient greek (which they already knew), ancient egyption and another one i cant remember.

            from there they were able to use what they knew to expand their understanding outwards.

            you’re better just writing in your first language and encrypting using strong encryption.

            keep in mind quantum computing is coming so you will need to use encryption designed to withstand that.

            You’ll also want to keep in mind that when you delete a file on a computer it usually isn’t destroyed, it’s just sort of de-referenced and maked as “available space” so you’ll need to ensure that your medium for writing isn’t writing unencrypted to disk at any point or at least is overwriting those sectors after use otherwise what you write could be recoverable without having to decrypt

            • Lmaydev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              10 months ago

              You also need to keep in mind that encryption is about being too complex to crack.

              As computers get faster algorithms become useless.

              Many state actors are recording encrypted communications and waiting for computers to catch up.

              So use the most over the top complex algorithms you can to extend that hypothetical time when it can be cracked.

              • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                I wonder if they’ll be able to crack those encrypted insurance dumps wikileaks used to release anytime soon. I imagine there will be some interesting revelations in them

            • AnarchistsForDemocracy@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              quantum computing is coming

              I never watched GOT but this has “winter is coming” vibes I am sure gpg wont work after quantum is commonplace I need to investigate other options as per your recommendation

              • xantoxis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                GPG has long been capable of using ciphers that don’t use polynomial methods and are therefore resistant to quantum decryption. And new ciphers are developed all the time; a ton of work is being done in the area of post-quantum encryption and those ciphers will be available to GPG when they’re tested and proven.

                (I still don’t recommend GPG to people very often; its many ongoing usability issues make it a non-starter. If you use encryption incorrectly you’re only creating the illusion of security, which is worse than having none.)

      • niartenyaw@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not quite what you’re asking for, but during WW2 the US employed Navajo speakers to use their language for certain verbal communications because it was so different from popular languages and hard to decipher. There’s a lot written about them out there. I would also recommend checking out The Code Book by Simon Singh, it’s a great recap of the history of secret codes and breaking them.

      • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The Voynich Manuscript (Wikipedia, YouTube) has been challenging to decipher. The video covers some of the reasons why it’s still undeciphered, as well as discusses some of the analytical methods used to attack such codices.

        In short, natural languages tend to leave fingerprints which can be used to attack crypto. It seems a mix of constructed language plus cryptography to obscure it is strongest.

  • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s stupid, any cypher you can keep in your head is easily cracked.

    If you want privacy, look towards encryption. Get a cheap laptop without internet access, install whatever Linux distribution, then keep everything encrypted.

    So all you need to keep in your head is your master password.

    • AnarchistsForDemocracy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s stupid, any cypher

      I wasn’t talking about a cypher but rather a full on language. I got the idea off of native american languages being used in the war to prevent decription of secret communication.

      • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        If it’s an existing language then it’s not secure.

        If you make up your own language you’ll waste a thousand hours and someone might use the notes you used to learn it.

        Just use damn encryption, it’s easy and fast. Also has additional benefits. If someone wants to force you to give them/translate your notes you can’t do much (they’ll know when your translation is inconsistent).

        With encryption you can hide a volume inside another one. If you enter the weaker password you can put decoy files there, with just your run of the mill notes. While behind a stronger password you hide your actual diary.

      • herrvogel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Using a foreign language only delays the “enemy”, which might be tactically valuable depending on the situation but the message will eventually get cracked, have no doubt about that. It’s not a secure way of hiding your information and it’s foolish to even consider it. Some forensic dude’s gonna analyze your shit and it’s all going to become 100% transparent in no time at all.

        Encryption, on the other hand, can be mathematically proven to be EXTREMELY unlikely to be cracked even by the best efforts of well funded experts, when properly implemented and used.

      • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Do you speak more than one language? Fluently? I speak 3 languages fluently, and know a few others to certain degrees. How long do you think it takes to learn a language fluently enough that you can use it for most stuff you might want to write? And even if you choose a weird or obscure language that will make it harder for you to learn, and if someone wants to read it all they need to do is pay any person who also speaks it.

        If on the other hand you want to invent your own language and writing system there won’t be any other speakers to consult, however inventing your own language will take you thousands of hours, and if you only speak english languages your created will likely just be code words for everything because you don’t know about things like declinations or gender. As for the writing it’s easier to create a hard to crack writing system, however at the end of the day your system will either be semantic or phonetic, i.e. a symbol will represent either a meaning or a sound, if each symbol is a meaning you’ll need thousands of them which means thousands of hours to create and learn just a basic setup, if on the other hand you use phonetic symbols it’s almost a guarantee your language will be cracked simply because of repeating patterns. So the best case scenario is that you spend the next 5 years developing and learning a new language, and it would take a couple of months, best case scenario some years for someone to break it.

        Let’s compare that with cryptography, you only need to remember a master key, if that master key is complex enough, e.g. 12 random dictionary words (which you can use several tools to generate), it would take all of the computer power in the world a couple of billion years to crack. Quantum computers might speed that up, but there are algorithms that work around that. How long does it take you to memorize 12 words? A couple of hours maybe, and you have something which is, in any meaningful use of the word, unbreakable. That seems like a much, much better deal.

        And this comes back to an idea in computer science which is “don’t reinvent the wheel”, whatever you think is your great idea to encrypt your messages is likely already been thought of and discarded by the people who understand the most advanced cryptography algorithms today, and if you understood them you wouldn’t need to think on writing foreign languages.

  • GhostsAreShitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 months ago

    You’re seriously underestimating the governments ability to decipher a made up language. Bear in mind any government probably has entire departments dedicated to cracking codes and translation. Encryption is going to be a million times better than anything you can come up with. I’d just assume that if you can think it up, someone else can figure it out.

  • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    As an older person, I would take a somewhat different path for myself, if only because I know for a fact that the first-level people that are doing the spying are anything but your regime’s very best.

    What you want is something that you can have in the open, looks worthless, shitty even; something that invites mockery as opposed to suspicion. Something in your own language and handwriting that the bottom-feeding impatient, intellectually challenged thugs who will actually be doing the searching open up, laugh incredulously, mock you for writing while you stand there silent, embarrassed and ashamed – and then toss aside as worthless.

    You’re right that pen and paper are the way to go, IMO, and if English were your native tongue I’d simply recommend that you learn cursive and then enshittify it: in the US, for example, most older people read and still write in cursive, but very few under the age of 40 or so, and even then they don’t see enough of it to be able to read shitty cursive. It’s the same for a number of languages: handwriting will always invite slop, and manual slop will never truly be machine readable. It’s often not even human readable except to its creator, and not always then. So you’d want to look at your own language and its handwriting traditions.

    Me, I’d go back to writing in English cursive, but now with a system of added hooks and slight errors that, on the surface, just make me look more sloppy and stupid (not hard, lol) but which mean something to me, and me only. Cursive is incredibly easy to fuck up in such a way that it is unintelligible to everyone but you; doctors do it all the time, and most people after a decade or two of signing their own name in it. You can easily fuck up your own in the same exact way, in whatever archaic but lingering handwriting system your native language uses, and that’s the writing part done.

    Then, you’ll also want a list of acronyms and code words that mean something to you only – and for good measure, learn to write absolutely horrifying poetry about sexual partners you will never have. Make all your journals look like the condensation of self-pitying incel tears running down the pages. Put your genuine thoughts between lines of rancid, revolting “oh no one will ever love me the grocer looked at me wrong I feel so misunderstood” horseshit, but remember that you can use theme as a keyword index: for example, whenever you mention “grocer” or another frequent character in your anguished tales, you know the next line contains references to a rally; “pretty girl” is a specific contact, whatever.

    Get into cheap fountain pens, and now paper and pen journaling is a legitimate hobby for you. And paper journals are easy to destroy: should you ever want to tear a page out and burn it in the kitchen sink, all you need is a lighter. You could even throw in some shit about how you were so angry (or ashamed, or depressed, or whatever) about what you’d written that you could never bear to see it again so you ripped it up and threw it away, oh woe is you. On every page, badly draw a lot of squiggles and useless illustrations and marginalia to make it visually confusing and difficult to follow. Cross out irrelevant words and underline other irrelevant words. Use different colors. Spill drinks on it every so often. Smear ink now and then.

    Make it look like a ten-year old got hold of a fountain pen and some meth.

    And in the middle of that shit, hide the information you want to keep, right there in the open.

    There’s literally no downside to paper these days. I’m guessing that your regime expects you to write everything online, keep everything online, just for ease. But your paper journals can be kept in plain sight, as well as your cheap pens and ink and fountain pen hobby supplies. (The uglier the better, but don’t go overboard: if you’re neat and clean, then your physical journals should be as well.)

    But should you ever come under suspicion, and the cops toss your home, they’re going to pick up those journals and read it and laugh at you and your truly shitty poetry, probably openly and in your face, before flinging it down and looking for your REAL digital cache of subversive info.

    I have great respect for unbreakable codes, such as the Navajo language referred to elsewhere in this thread, but in real life, an unknown language will attract attention and cause low-level enforcers to seize that book and pass it up to real translators and code breakers.

    Instead, if you openly make it trash to the thugs who will be doing the searching, creating journals that they just laugh at, mocking you and what they think is your sorry self-pitying life, it will never get that far. That’s where I’d put my own efforts, anyway.

    I am sorry you have to take these precautions, and wish you well in your endeavors. May you be a thorn up the ass of your regime, lol. Good luck to you.

    • jhulten@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Like you said, stenography (hiding meaning in something else) is more important than cryptography. Cryptography only lasts until the lead pipe is swung at your knees.

  • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So, people like to think that you can do something clever like invent a code to hide things, and technically, yes. And if they ever search your place and find it, they’ll assume it’s serious business and you’ll get the XKCD Security treatment.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    If it’s enough content, an AI can learn any language naturally just by training on it.

    Only solution is an encrypted airgapped computer that cannot physically connect to anything. But the set up makes you suspicious enough to get in trouble just for having it probably.

    There was an encryption software a while back that would open two different partitions depending on the password you put in so if someone forces you to open it under duress, they get the drive filled with naked ladyboys instead of the one with your revolution plans.

  • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 months ago

    Cockney slang exists for this reason.

    Toki Pona is a constructed language that can be learned in a day, as well.

    Also Esperanto.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      There’s millions of examples of this. Everywhere there’s an oppressed minority group, that group eventually develops its own dialect that mutates quickly to make it easier to identify in-group members and to confuse authorities of the majority group.

      That isn’t a secure comms strategy though, it’s just something that happens organically. All the oppressing group needs to do is recruit a defector from the oppressed group and they can understand everything.

      Cryptography is how you do it. And cryptography exists and is easily accessible, unless OP truly believes everything electronic has government spy tech in it, which is the realm of actual paranoia.

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Lack of need to do so to track dissidents deemed dangerous to the function of the state

        The closest esperanto ever got to revolutionary usage was that some esperantists taught it to others in Gulags and Concentration camps while pretending it was another language to avoid the suspicion of Nazis and Soviets, who both regarded it as subversive because it was a language explicitly designed to be “easy” to learn and to encourage international cooperation

        Toki-Pona was invented in the 2000s and achieves it’s low word count by basically just reducing itself to a pre-civilizational language without concepts for most colors and not having a proper numeral system, things that might be necessary for use in inspiring and carrying out an ideologically motivated revolution.

        The closest America has to a language usable as a code language used by a dissident underclass is AAVE, which is a dialect of english that’s been trending towards american standard english as time has gone by and is even easier to learn to understand than Toki-Pona or Esperanto if a man in a suit was determined enough to spy on its speakers.

    • AnarchistsForDemocracy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      But isn’t cockney slang very easily understood due to it’s popularity? Was it at one time difficult to understand for outsiders? I had no idea about this.

  • Anti-Face Weapon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    You don’t need to make an entire language, you only need a cypher.

    I invite you to do some research of cryptography. There are ways to make messages and information inaccessible to anyone else, prying governments and businesses be damned.

    You should also do research into online data privacy.

    If this is something that you’re genuinely worried about, there are steps that you can take to mitigate your risk.

    [Post edited to be less rude and more productive]

  • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Two things

    1. If you’re able to encrypt; then done case closed. You can even add a “destruct” login where logging in to a secondary account deletes the primary account under the event that the gov forces you to login.
    2. If you’re not able to encrypt (e.g. shared system or cameras watching you type, or written documents) then then slang can actually be effective and easier than a whole language. It can be dynamic/fluid, and gives the author the defense of metaphors and misunderandings. It’s basically the only way to have hidden communication with others “in plain sight”.

    Finally, governments are practical. If something looks interesting, like a thing labeled “journal” with mysterious words inside, they’re going to spend resources on it. Your best protection can be boringness. Write a novel, like LOTR, have the language be part of the novel, and when characters speak, replace their dialog with your journal entry. Put it on the shelf with other novels, and it becomes something that’s not worth looking into.

  • pan_troglodytes@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    realtime encryption systems are what you’re looking for - but in the grand scheme of things, the only privacy that exists is between your ears.

    • AnarchistsForDemocracy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      the only privacy that exists is between your ears.

      And even that might alreay have changed (if you know somebody’s seach history for example and their meta data) you might even infer some of what they are thinking. Let alone any progress in understanding of the brain and being able to read out thoughts from brainwaves through some future breakthrough… or even just using live-mri scan

      however thanks for the realtime encryption systems that is very intersting!

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    @AnarchistsForDemocracy when I was a kid I made up my own. By the time I was an adult I could write in it fluently. It has also evolved over time.

    While I’m sure experts could crack it if they really wanted to, for casual use it really does come in handy.

    But in your case I think you need to use proper encryption.

    • AnarchistsForDemocracy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I admire your achievement! Has anybody ever come close to translating/understanding your language? It’d be interesting to see how long this language could withstand attempts of translation. I wonder if languages could be given a rating based on how many people-hours it takes to achieve this.

  • amio@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    I mean, just use encryption? A language would be security through obscurity at best, anyway.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    I just happen to be a part of a particular discord server that is essentially a fan development group for a long-closed MMORPG. There’s been a fan project to revive it ongoing for many years now (original source code is lost at this point) and there is a playable version of the client, but it’s little more than a glorified chat room with some clothing/animations for your avatar.

    Someone just happened to ask about game/chat encryption in the discord server and the response was that there was a form of encryption for chat messages, but more importantly, it was an obscure game that nobody would think to monitor for traffic in the first place.

    That got me thinking… there have already been things like the Minecraft Uncensored Library where you can download a map that has banned literature stored on it that would normally be flagged by surveillance states, but since it’s all contained within a file that runs on a game program, it’s impossible to track. The game itself is a form of obfuscation.

    Theoretically, one could log on to a game service that has one foot in the grave (or set up a private server, if the service is no longer running) and you would have plausible cover from anyone who would be spying on your traffic (they’d just see you as logged into a game, sending packets back and forth) with the added benefit of encrypted private messages that you find in just about every modern multiplayer game.

    I think your idea is good too, but I don’t know enough about linguistics to be able to say how difficult this would be, but I imagine anyone determined enough could figure it out. The last time I remember hearing about a “language” being built from scratch was the Phyrexian language from Magic: The Gathering, which is getting more fleshed out over time as hints and clues about the syntax and phonics are revealed via known/confirmed English translations.

  • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    IMO to write down your thoughts just for your own usage, you can either encrypt your data if it is legal to do so, or you can write your thoughts on paper. Otherwise, check out this evergreen CrimethInc article about security culture.

    I wouldn’t choose Elven Tongue or Klingon or similar fictional languages as a basis for a secret code because the people who code break are probably aware that those languages exist. Additionally, if I were a data scientist trying to sift through your communications trying to find coded text, the first thing I would classify is what languages are present. If Elven Tongue showed up, that is probably what I would look at first.

    On that note, if I was trying to hide something, I would probably use a whole-word replacement scheme in a way that makes a whole sentence look normal. Even if the government collects all my data, do they really have the time to manually review all of it? Probably not; they’re probably going to use some kind of machine learning algorithm to search for “problematic” strings in their dataset and then flag whoever said them for further manual surveillance. If you think you are already an active surveillance target, then you might need to go with cyphers.

    It’s probably a good idea to learn some code breaking. Lastly, Lemmy is a public social network. I wouldn’t put any plans that you ever intend to execute on this website or any of its instances in any form. It’s just not what it’s designed for. Best of luck.

    • AnarchistsForDemocracy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      thanks for your input, I am not planning anything just wondering.

      I was thinking of creating a new language more, rather than using Elven Tongue. I only wanted to use it as an example.