• danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m honestly fine with companies not paying taxes so long as their profits are being spent on people in lower tax brackets.

        Current tax structure makes it easy for the company to just give all their profits to their executives.

        70% tax on income over $1 million. Go back to a progressive tax structure for company profits. Not sure why my local donut shop is paying the same rate as Microsoft.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Tax productivity, not work. Worker productivity has skyrocketed in the past few decades, but taxes have remained constant. So the rich have been able to extract increasing amounts of productivity, while paying proportionally less and less in taxes. Meanwhile, worker wages have remained stagnant, meaning their productivity has gone up but they’re still being paid (and taxed) the same.

      Wealth taxes should still absolutely be a thing, but they should be entirely divorced from a work (productivity) tax.

  • canofcam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    The answer to this post, and almost everything, is to tax the wealthy.

    AI is not ruining anything. The people in control of it are.

  • fishos@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is a moronic take. Do we also tax tools when they make a 4 person job a 1/2 person job? This is just an ass backwards way of approaching the wealth inequality and poor working conditions issues by focusing on a tool instead of the system itself.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean, we easily could.

      I pay property tax on my business tools.

      So you just extend that concept. I don’t see why not.

      • fishos@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        ok apparently we do in fact tax tools. And I can see how AI, being on the cloud, might not normally fall under computer equipment or other things that would be taxed, thus needing it to be specifically included in tax law. Fuck me on that one.

        I’ll give you that.

        BUT

        I still stand by this being a bandaid to a much larger problem concerning capitalists exploiting the labor of many and not being required to give everyone fair pay/equity. The inequality between the workforce and the ownership class is the problem. Them using AI is just their current tool of oppression, but not their only.

        We need to address the root cause and directly tax the billionaires. And remove stock backed loans or at least realize their gains and tax them whenever they do use them as collateral for a loan. Shouldnt be able to claim unrealized gains and use it for collateral at the same time.

        • Big Eye@mgtowlemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          If companies start giving everyone fair pay/equity all the system collapse, even China the most communist country in the world right now don’t do that, inequity it’s what keep a certain amount of money flowing, unless you want all people dying of hunger or worst. I’m not saying capitalism is the perfect system but the imperfection of it it’s what make it work. we can’t pretend a perfect world is possible and make a living on dreaming. there will be always poor people and rich people just like there are smart people and dumb people, no everyone is equal.

          I mean real world isn’t equal.