𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 days agoWhy would'nt this work?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square227fedilinkarrow-up1552arrow-down131file-text
arrow-up1521arrow-down1imageWhy would'nt this work?lemmy.ml𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square227fedilinkfile-text
It can look dumb, but I always had this question as a kid, what physical principles would prevent this?
minus-squareKorhaka@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up57arrow-down1·7 days agoIf your stick is unbreakable and unavoidable you have already broken laws of physics anyway
minus-squareDasKapitalist@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·7 days ago If your stick is unbreakable and unavoidable you have already broken laws of physics anyway You have it backwards: if your stick is unavoidable, NOT HAVING IT is the impossible thing.
minus-squareKorhaka@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 days agoAutocorrected from unfoldable. This is what I get for occasionally browsing on a shitty Amazon tablet. At least it was cheap to the point of being almost free.
minus-squareGnuLinuxDude@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 days agoIn carrot vs stick terms, this is the most unfortunate fellow: he who can’t avoid the stick.
If your stick is unbreakable and unavoidable you have already broken laws of physics anyway
You have it backwards: if your stick is unavoidable, NOT HAVING IT is the impossible thing.
Autocorrected from unfoldable. This is what I get for occasionally browsing on a shitty Amazon tablet. At least it was cheap to the point of being almost free.
In carrot vs stick terms, this is the most unfortunate fellow: he who can’t avoid the stick.