• pandapoo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    … agreeing to be directly compatible with Whatsapp would mean they agree to surrender the privacy for every single instance of Signal-WhatsApp communication.

    If the whole reason for your foundations existence is privacy, it seems that it would be an existential danger to create a partnership with the implicit understanding that it will destroy privacy.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Some level of privacy, yes. Solely in WhatsApp-signal chats. And users can be notified of that, like they were with SMS.

      But you know what the alternative is? Nobody using signal. And that’s objectively worse.

      Cross-compatibility with WhatsApp would mean way more people on signal, and way more people willing to try, meaning more signal-signal chats.

      Signal-SMS is FAR less private, but they were fine with that for years.