• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    OnlyFans told Reuters that police do not have to subscribe to investigate a creator’s posts, but the platform only grants free access to accounts when there’s an active investigation. That means once police suspect that CSAM is being exchanged on an account, they get “full access” to review “account details, content, and direct messages,” Reuters reported.

    God forbid police have to do their fucking job.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The alternative is even more frightening for cops doing their jobs. Could you imagine how little the police would get done if they had special accounts with unlimited access to every OnlyFans account? Personally if I had something like that I would probably just phase out of this reality.

    • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      They want to creep on people. The don’t care about the kids. They want to look at their daughter’s friends or the woman down the roads account. Fuck All Cops

      • sunzu@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Can’t they just pay if that’s their goal?

        Police is not based around low level cops, top brass wants this and pushing for it imho

        It is about control

  • Erasmus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Headline should read:

    ‘Cops upset they have to pay to jerk it like everyone else.’

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Jeff, why the living fuck have you tried to claim 5 femboy OnlyFans premium-tier subscriptions on your work expenses account?!”

    sweating “uhhh… to… ummm… make sure it wasn’t CSAM…?”

    Oh! Nice work Jeff. Very proactive. For a second I thought something dodgy might have been going on.”

  • sunzu@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    These “cops” could check their local Catholic church or another place of worship, if they were looking to “detect” for child abusers.

  • rob200@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    If only fans is not encrypted, wouldn’t these cops have other ways to detect and tackle csam material?

    Assuming it is not encrypted, what’s stopping them from doing their job? Only thing I can think of they could use as an excuse would be, accessing copyrighted materials, especially since it’s under a pay wall.

  • Alpha71@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Bit of a side note, but why did they go with CSAM, when CP is quicker and easier to say/type?

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Pornography” implies legitimacy and consent, from what I’ve read.

    • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Unironically I think that wording is being pushed by the porn giants to not have it associated with porn.

      Though since the media, news and all that stuff don’t like to use the word porn too, it made it easier to be caught on.