Noise in a RNG. Hungry, more likely to give into majority opinion so I can get back to brunch!
Noise in a RNG. Hungry, more likely to give into majority opinion so I can get back to brunch!
Maybe they just want a future where billionaires aren’t burning down the planet.
Course they could pick up pitchforks and take matters into their own hands. Quit blaming other people for their problems right?
I thought that was the GOP
I mean the first person to come to mind when I heard victim mentality was Donald Trump.
I think whoever framed the presumption of innocence and proof beyond a reasonable doubt felt that way.
Jurors themselves are complicated. Some people are racist, some people are just hateful, some people respect authority so much that they’ll just believe whatever the district attorney says. All of these conditions can create a situation where the jury won’t reach consensus easily .
And pretty much everybody just wants to get back to brunch and taking care of their families.
I think what you are speaking to is values. What I’m talking about is emotions as they are felt in the moment and how those will affect a jury’s outcome.
Hence people are not computers.
No
People aren’t machines and don’t weigh data the way machines do.
It’s more like this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prospect_theory
Than this.
Would make more sense if it was two female characters.
Plus, the oligarch already has a utility belt.
Most of the liberals on here just want to be back at brunch. So those are the feelings you’re getting.
Personally, her hypocrisy over weed means little to me compared to the children she’s planning to help murder.
And, I’ll still vote for her because more children will die from climate change under Trump.
I’m voting against worsening climate change. Outside of that they’re both neo liberal shitheads.
So you won’t vote for someone supported by Nazis but will vote for someone supporting Nazis.
I guess hypocricy really doesn’t matter.
I did a Behavior Activation Therapy course and we used a tool similar to what you posted in the OP.
Only we listed a few activities along with how difficult we thought it would be. Each morning we would reflect on the activities we got done and write down how difficult they actually ended up (sometimes more or less). And make a new list.
The process helped me to challenge a lot of thoughts and emotions around activities.
This is more like her insisting you not eat cashews, because she hates cashews.
Only in this case her hate is homophobic/transphobic. Women can wear boy stuff. And men can, in theory, wear ‘queer’ stuff. As long as it’s not her partner doing it.
So, left equals centrist I see.
Yeah I’m not a fan of it lol. Thanks though.
How does it check for bias? Because pink news isn’t left on trans issues. Yet it ranks as left with high credibility.
In older mice the best telomere therapies are increasing lifespan by ~15%. Max human lifespan is currently ~120. So, if those same therapies work on old billionaires they still wouldn’t live past 150.
Models for extending life in young mice and mice zygotes hit around ~25%.
200 isn’t within our grasp currently. 150 is if the animal models work on humans. But the treatments work better the younger the animal. Working best on embryos.
Tldr: It’s unlikely today’s billionaires will live past 150 without a breakthrough in telomere research.
I was going to say a frog since they can change sex.
But jellyfish can apparently change sex and be immortal, so, I change my answer to the immortal jellyfish too.
XY people AFAB have a genetic condition that makes their bodies insensitive to testosterone. Their testicles never drop. They don’t develop body hair or menstrate.
And they have more trouble than XX women developing muscle mass.
None of this has anything to do with the Olympics because Fox News is making shit up.
Some animals do have language and animals that are around people a lot likely have an inner voice that is their owner’s voice.
They likely don’t plan using this voice, the way people do. But it certainly influences their behavior.
A dog that’s been yelled at for getting in the garbage might hear a no in their head even if their owners at work.
Billionaires and large corporations are destroying our future. I think placing the blame where it belongs isn’t playing the victim but calling attention to ongoing abuse.
I don’t personally advocate for violence but rather solidarity.
A global strike would be an appropriate action. As would raiding corporate stores for food and clothing. But people’s material conditions make it hard to go without a paycheck and still survive. And state violence makes the idea of stealing from large corporations frightening.
It’s all dialectics.
But that doesn’t mean large corporations aren’t to blame for our planet burning. And blame should be placed where it belongs. Not on those being abused and suffering.