I mean if you’re under feudal relations supporting capitalism makes you progressive, but right now we’re operating under socialized production with capitalists constraining production around exchange value so yeah supporting maintaining capitalism is right wing. Let socialized production benefit society.
- 4 Posts
- 1.04K Comments
Hopefully Chinese democracy will prevail against western authoritarianism.
OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlto
Memes@lemmy.ml•Lemmy's version of TDS - Tankie Derangement Syndrome
16·3 months agoAuthority exercised by the proletariat through a DotP is qualitatively different than authority exercised by capital through a DoC.
Read the analysis of the Paris commune in “State or Revolution”.
OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlMto
World News@lemmy.ml•Could we have a rule that prohibits commenting about Media Bias Fact Check?
5·3 months agoSounds good
OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlto
Memes@lemmy.ml•Libs do love perpetuating that western invented "magical" word 😁
121·4 months agoI think you’re getting hung up on an artificial separation of politics and economics, you should look up a critique of this or investigate why political economy is a useful framework for analysis.
OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlMto
World News@lemmy.ml•Here’s the full text of Trump’s 20-point plan to end Israel’s war on Gaza
102·7 months agothere is no way Biden or Harris would have approved the 20 point genocidal plan in the article.
Biden straight up gave arms and support to Israel over his tenure, including after October 7th when the genocide intensified. Biden also supported the genocide.
https://www.google.com/search?q=italy+operation+gladio
There are a few academic publications on this in the first page of Google search results
I’m assuming there was a large violent massacre
Holy shit people just say things
A munch is just a social. People chat and stuff, kinky things don’t happen, and it is generally discouraged to use the space for cruising. Different munch dress codes vary from “be very normycore inconspicuous” to “be decent”
OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlMto
World News@lemmy.ml•China, Russia, and Iran have hypersonic missiles. And that changes everything.
41·9 months agoAh, a YouTuber named “habitual linecrosser”. Perhaps the “source: it came to me in a dream” commenter was too generous.
OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlMto
World News@lemmy.ml•China, Russia, and Iran have hypersonic missiles. And that changes everything.
133·9 months agoAre you claiming you know this from classified information?
OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlMto
World News@lemmy.ml•China, Russia, and Iran have hypersonic missiles. And that changes everything.
141·9 months agoCould you cite this please?
What are you talking about have you never heard of
emperorComrade Puyi?
OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlto
Memes@lemmy.ml•Read Theory Like Your Survival Depends On It (It Does)
11·10 months agoReally good book! A little bit inaccessible in the first two chapters though.
Jokes aside, a good start is to join a socialist org, participate, and start developing yourself politically. I believe cowbee has a good reading list.
OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlto
Memes@lemmy.ml•Read Theory Like Your Survival Depends On It (It Does)
15·10 months agoBut only if you’re doing what needs to be done.
Not a dude, please don’t “bro” me
Here is another helpful link, on citizen perception of the importance of democracy and whether their government is democratic.
It was founded by a former NATO secretary so it has a pro-western bias.
https://allianceofdemocracies.org/democracy-perception-index
Here is a chart sourced from its its 2024 report. As you can see Chinese people have more faith in democracy and the democratic nature of their government than westerners do.
The whole brainwashing thing is nonsense, as Cowbee pointed out you misread the data on the 11 percent. It seems like you are misreading data to support your preconceived notions.

China is a democracy, even studies by conservative western institutions show Chinese people have higher satisfaction with their government, more belief in the importance of democracy, and more belief in the democratic nature of their government than western European and American citizens do for their own governments.
They have a more comprehensive democracy too. Consultative processes and deliberative processes are enshrined in institutions in a way that they are not within western bourgeois democracies.
OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•Ive wrestled with spirituality for a while now, and and don't know what to do?
3·1 year agoFor me it isn’t really worth thinking about unfalsifiable things? If you’re looking for guidance, community, and inclusion, go join a socialist org or a queer community center?
I thought the US killed millions, not 100,000s?
Reposting the top comment of this thread which is really good: https://www.reddit.com/r/communism101/comments/ahvu9h/is_north_korea_a_hereditary_dictatorship/
The fact is that Kim Jong-Un, and his father, and his grandfather, do not and did not hold the highest positions of power in the government. The de facto head of state in the D.P.R.K is currently Kim Young-Nam, who has held this position since 1998. The current position of Kim Jong-Un is as you said, as he previously held the position of Chairman of the National Defense Commission, which was altered in 2016 to better reflect the situation at hand with better organisation. Kim Il-Sung held the positions of Premier and President of the Presidium for a long time, though he did retire from the latter in 1983, being succeeded by Yang Hyong-Sop; this is unsurprising, as Kim Il-Sung was a incredibly competent and well-respected leader, and especially so among his own people. The fact is, influential positions have become more decentralised with each generation, as the power of the state becomes more distributed among the proletariat and in accordance with society, in a rather natural way that may, hopefully, lead to a complete withering way of the state in future, as other aspects, too, decline, assuming a defeat of capitalist powers simultaneously with the existence of the D.P.R.K.
Allegedly, Kim Il-Sung did suggest Kim Jong-Il succeed him, because Jong-Il had been instilled with a revolutionary ideology for his entire life. The rest of the party and the people are said to have agreed with this - through their usual discussions, one would assume - and so, Kim Jong-Il succeeded his father in some positions, whilst others were removed, split up and redistributed, or reassigned. That is why there is no longer a President of the D.P.R.K: The position was no longer necessary, and equivalent powers were to be divided among multiple roles.
On your point of their democracy: The decision of whom is elected is not done so with the ballot. The voting is done through open discussions prior to the ballot, comparable to the Soviet design, which could also be seen in Libya to some degree. After a common consensus is met through these periods of discussion, the vote is cast as a confirmation of this selection, hence the lack of negative votes for candidates; democratic centralism requires unity, after all, and so does a socialist state. You can find many posts here that touch on the matter. I recommend this for some more information.
So, in short: The D.P.R.K is not a hereditary dictatorship, with power being decentralised through successive generations, and the election of officials are made through common consensus as decided by mass discussions.
Hopefully that helps.