• cybirdman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe that was their game with the federation stuff. “Hey we didn’t start this, we were just following suit on this open source project”. Anyway this logic wouldn’t fly in any court, they can’t have a copyright on text-based social media. They can only own their branding. Musk is just throwing a hissy fit again

    • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I think Elon is trying to say they’re stealing IP because lots of the Twitter employees he fired went to work on Threads. This is probably where the fediverse stuff comes in clutch, as they’re just implementing ActivityPub, so it’s not like it’s industry secrets or anything.

        • intensely_human@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t see the conflict?

          Here it’s a case of hypocrisy, as it’s a conflict between berating someone else for some behavior, and engaging in it ourselves.

          • ShortBoweledClown@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re making a false equivalence. Musk is scared about losing more of his money. People here seemingly don’t like Meta and don’t want it to infest lemmy. Those aren’t even close to being the same.

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Or, Musk’s actions could be in line with protecting free speech. I mean, that’s the fear we have of Meta here: that it will destroy this space and silence voices.

              So if (a) Musk claims he’s protecting free speech, and then (b) takes actions consistent with that view, then there’s no opening to make an argument of the form “Must claims X but does Y”, when Y could be interpreted as a manifestation of goal X.

                • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah I don’t think he has a case either. I’m talking about the perceived motivations when his actions are consistent with his stated motivations (for running twitter, the ones mentioned in the comment thread I responded to), as evidenced by our own shared pairing of stated motivations and actions.

  • duckef@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Zucks hair looks like those tiktok vids of guys who’s baber fucked their haircut up.

  • Nepenthe@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lmfao. Well, thanks for the free PR, I’m sure, because some poor secretary in his office knows there isn’t jack shit they can sue over.

    Not that I’m ever going to pretend to like Meta, but having competition is supposed to be the definition of his precious free market. There’s even rules and everything about monopolies. Can’t take issue with that unless he’s ready to declare himself not a capitalist.

    • doggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t really need a good argument to file a lawsuit. And Musk seems petty and short-sighted enough to try it.

      I’m not particularly fond of either, so I’m gonna make some popcorn and hope this blows up into the biggest shit storm possible.